• tourist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it really that easy? Why did they even bother?

    They’ve known about ad blockers for well over decade now and their “solution” can be bypassed with inspect-element. Nice.

    • Jako301@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is, in fact, not that easy. It works to hide the warning, but once you reache the stage where they block videos, it won’t help you.

      The better option is to block all scripts on YouTube and only whitelist the 2 or 3 that are necessary to watch videos.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      It hasn’t really mattered enough for them to spend any engineering time on it before. Zero interest rates are over, though, and money actually kind of means something now. This is just the first move in a chain of many.

      A warning for anyone relying on stuff like adblockers for YouTube - it’s not that hard for Google to figure out that we’re doing it, simply query for which users have zero ad impressions. Google also has a certain tendency to permaban Google accounts in violation of their policies and then ignoring all appeals. If you rely on Google accounts for email, photos and the like, this might be the time to plan contingencies.

      Personally I’ve started using Piped instead. The lack of recommendations is a bit of a bummer, but in all honesty it was kind of like the switch from Reddit to Lemmy - just had to wean myself off the digital sugar pills.