According to Nintendo’s annual report published earlier this week, only 4.2% of company managers in Japan are women. This is a number that has remained unchanged since 2021, when the company formed its ‘Nintendo Women and Allies’ initiative, pledging to “promote women’s careers”

    • thorbot@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not an excuse though. If you state publicy as a company that you will make changes, then it’s not unreasonable to expect those changes to actually happen.

      • avapa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Japanese society is very old-fashioned, male dominated, hierarchical and “I’m older than you so that means I’m right”. Japan’s cybersecurity minister admitted a couple of years ago that he had never used a computer in his life. While I understand the frustration it is (unfortunately) not surprising that these changes do not happen in a timely fashion.

        • 13zero@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Japan’s cybersecurity minister admitted a couple of years ago that he had never used a computer in his life.

          Then he has never been the victim of a cyber-attack!

        • Grangle1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is especially true when it comes to traditional gender roles in the workplace. Women in Japan are often only hired as secretaries or “office ladies” in big companies, basically to shuffle papers and serve tea. Not exactly big decision-making roles. Heck, even making an announcement is likely a big thing in this regard for a Japanese company, if they actually follow through they could really be seen as progressive by Japanese standards.

      • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but when it comes to corporations saying they’ll do things, its almost always just whatever garbage will benefit the company at the time, regardless of the fact they likely will never follow through.

        I think the lesson is that you should never believe these statements about the future, the only times major corporations can be honest is if they’re reporting something that already happened.

        • thorbot@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not really about believing them or not. It’s more just bringing attention to their bs

          • ClarkDoom@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This isn’t BS… if you wanna just focus on that percentage, Nintendo would literally have to fire people to create the openings needed to improve that number or create jobs during a recession. Creating jobs in a recession isn’t really a smart option. There are plenty of things to get mad about in the corporate world but a company that actually creates job security and employs such a high percentage of older folks isn’t one to be up in arms about.

            • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              They said they would do one thing, and haven’t followed through. I would call that bullshitting, I just think it’s nothing out of the ordinary.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The changes occur in the hiring practices, but when the average time an employee works for a company is as high as it is in Japan you’re looking at a decade or so to see the numbers move significantly.

        Sorry firing half of the managers wasn’t their move? Lol

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t think its fair to look at the overall percentage. Instead, we should look into how many new managers got appointed and how many of these were woman. If that remains unchanged too, then it’s fair to complain.

    • Dalinar@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did a quick google and found a Japanese study that said the average tenure for an employee in Japan is 11 years.

      op it’s going to take time for anyone to leave.

      • KuroJ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly this. When I lived in Japan I worked with some employees that have literally been in that same position longer than I’ve been alive (men and women).

        It’s going to be a while.

  • Dark_Blade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s literally been 2 years, and as others have said, they’re not gonna start firing people or creating positions just to boost some numbers on a spreadsheet.

    • planforrain@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      they definitely could but I would hope they are not because that would be tampering with the whole metric which just makes it meaningless and fuels haters

  • kowcop@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    it seems weird to pass over the top ranking candidate for a job (male or female) to fulfil a quota.

    • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are usually several people who are all similarly qualified for a position. People often get chosen for arbitrary reasons like being friends with the person doing the hiring.