I disagree. The supercharging network was a big factor in choosing to buy a Tesla for me. If other manufacturers didn’t change, my next car would also be a Tesla. Now I’ll have other options.
Yes, but they could have been earning profits from mostly-idle SuperCharger stations over the past 5+ years. The investment required to install a 20-station SuperCharger must be immense – for it to be idle so much is a huge lost opportunity to get a faster return on that investment.
The charger fragmentation is annoying, bit you can get adapters. The root problem is that even if you have an adapter, only Tesla cars can charge at Tesla chargers.
The Tesla network communicates with the car to identify the account to charged. Which sounds easy, but really means every car needs to be associated with an account, and Tesla just wouldn’t let non-Tesla cars charge. Now with the Ford and GM deal Ford and GM cars will soon be allowed to charge at their network.
Even when you can charge at a charger, having to have an account for a charger is annoying. Again, getting the article, can you imagine if you needed an app or a seperate prepaid account for Chevron, Shell, Co-op, Mobil, Esso, Petro-Can, Save-On, Domo whatever station you used? Tap to pay is the obvious solution, but most DCFC still push their own app and account. Tesla seems to get a pass because it’s by far the largest network, but they absolutely perpetuate the non-standardization of the EV market for their own benefit.
Even the Ford and GM moving to NACS might not really be the end of this fragmentation. The cynic in me wonders if Ford and GM want to delay adoption of EVs so they can sell more ICE cars.
I disagree. The supercharging network was a big factor in choosing to buy a Tesla for me. If other manufacturers didn’t change, my next car would also be a Tesla. Now I’ll have other options.
Yes, but they could have been earning profits from mostly-idle SuperCharger stations over the past 5+ years. The investment required to install a 20-station SuperCharger must be immense – for it to be idle so much is a huge lost opportunity to get a faster return on that investment.
They were making it back in car sales.
The charger fragmentation is annoying, bit you can get adapters. The root problem is that even if you have an adapter, only Tesla cars can charge at Tesla chargers.
The Tesla network communicates with the car to identify the account to charged. Which sounds easy, but really means every car needs to be associated with an account, and Tesla just wouldn’t let non-Tesla cars charge. Now with the Ford and GM deal Ford and GM cars will soon be allowed to charge at their network.
Even when you can charge at a charger, having to have an account for a charger is annoying. Again, getting the article, can you imagine if you needed an app or a seperate prepaid account for Chevron, Shell, Co-op, Mobil, Esso, Petro-Can, Save-On, Domo whatever station you used? Tap to pay is the obvious solution, but most DCFC still push their own app and account. Tesla seems to get a pass because it’s by far the largest network, but they absolutely perpetuate the non-standardization of the EV market for their own benefit.
Even the Ford and GM moving to NACS might not really be the end of this fragmentation. The cynic in me wonders if Ford and GM want to delay adoption of EVs so they can sell more ICE cars.