Meanwhile in Germany:

  • Domkat@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Except that if you calculate the complete cost including building the plants it’s stupendously expensive compared to renewables even including energy storage.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        I do like nuclear, but of course the costs matter regardless of profit seeking. If you have two options that are same benefit but one costs more, to go with that one is just wasteful.

      • Domkat@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why is that irrelevant? These plants don’t run forever and are very expensive. You wouldn’t buy a car either that costs 15 million Euro, but in return just uses 1liter of diesel per 100km.

          • Domkat@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            That is factually incorrect. The oldest reactors still in service are around 60years old and have to be maintained and repaired at high costs as safety relevant parts are heavily deteriorated.

            With rising safety measures new plants get more expensive from year to year all the while renewables get cheaper and cheaper in production.

      • Nobsi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nuclear costs double per kilowatt than solar tho??
        And Nuclear Plants are always built by for profit companies?