I’ll go first. I’ve used a lot of search engines, I used duckduckgo for quite some time but found their search results kinda bad. I’m currently using ecosia the search results are similar to ddg’s but at least I’m planting trees, so there’s that.

      • noodlejetski@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        yup. or rather their short form, !g and !a in your example, because no one’s got time to type out the entire names (:

  • cereals@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Most small search engines use bing results which are a hit or miss compared to Google.

    Startpage is the only privacy focused one I found that uses Google search results. The UI is fine for the most part, except the image search maybe.

    Edit: typo

  • Kissaki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    DuckDuckGo

    I also use Firefox search bookmarks for searching specific sites.

    Search Bookmark: You prepare the URL with a %s placeholder and give the bookmark a tag, and you can type tag searchterm and it’ll open it.

    I’m using it for opening word definitions, word translations, searching reference documentation, searching specific platforms/websites/media types, etc.

  • Adi2121@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using SearXNG. It is a fork of SearX, a popular open source metasearch search engine. Basically SearX allows you to use multiple search engines for a search, and only the results are there, no ads. SearXNG changes the UI to be better, adds some other engines for a variety of things to search, like images. Currently I’m using ericafteric.top as my instance; it is the fastest US instance with search suggestions support since I can’t selfhost.

    • pimeys@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I run my own SearXNG instance too. I set it up to a Hetzner box, then blocked all ports from the firewall except on the Tailscale network. This means the machine which wants to use the search needs to be connected first to the same Tailscale network. It allows me to prevent being blocked by the search providers for too much traffic and is been working great. I just open http://SearXNG from my browser and start searching.

  • nullishcat@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kagi. Yes, it’s paid and the pricing structure is really meh, but:

    • Actual privacy
    • No BS like with DDG
    • AI features (like a “quick answer” feature that’s really useful)
    • Has its own index along with others
    • Search results are great, probably better than DDG’s
    • “Lenses” (basically narrow results by a set of sites)
    • Devs are pretty cool
    • DengueDucky@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want to give it a try but it’s hard to justify the cost with limited searches. I don’t want to have to keep track of how many times I’ve searched or second guess if I “really need to search for that”.

    • Rick@thesimplecorner.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For some reason the thought of a paid search engine has never even crossed by mind before. I’ve been using DDG but this has peaked my curiosity. Thank you.

      Edit: The pricing is… very… meh.

    • Pumpkin@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I didn’t know it was privacy focused or that they were building their own index, that’s really cool. Do you think it’s worth the money?

      • nullishcat@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bit biased cause I’ve had it for a while and have a ‘legacy plan’. But even without that, absolutely.

    • smoke_bird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using Kagi for a few months now and I love it. When I think about how much of my life revolves around accurate information, the price is negligible.

    • Nina@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was using DuckDuckGo and it was giving me pretty ‘eh’ results, only marginally better than google on the surface level, but both weren’t really usable for deep older searches. (and ddg starting to add sus ads/promoted) Brave is better, but Kagi has been fantastic when I’ve really needed to find something specific, technical, or very old. I think the best way to come about the pricing structure and limited search results is that I think it’s not supposed to be your only search engine from then on. There are times when you need what kagi gives in terms of producing quality and relevant results, and times you just wanna search “[company name] reviews/is a scam?” that using kagi wouldn’t serve you better than anything else, so it’s more of a tool that you bring out when you aren’t finding what you need with free search engines. On it’s own page it doesn’t try and oversell you on it, they admit that the majority of people don’t need paid search most of the time.

      I haven’t approached if it’s an early netflix thing where you could split the bill with others for one login/family plan, that might make it more feasible.

    • mego_pie@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can, it just works a bit differently than google if that is what you’re used to. It doesn’t outright exclude results with -, just de-emphasizes it in the results, of course with how tailored many web pages are to gaming search algorithms that doesn’t do much. If you want to outright eliminate certain websites from the search you can do that with -site:siteyouwantgone.here

      • teoria@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It can literally use any search engine you think of as a backend, so its strictly higher quality? Unless thats what you meant

      • darcmage@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t that hard to determine without specifying which engines are used in your chosen instance? Searx/Searng has provided superior results for me using a combination of engines compared to anything provided by any of the alternatives by themselves.

  • Phil L.@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ecosia on my tablet because of nice integrated browser and DuckDuck+Firefox on the PC

    Am also checking out Brave on PC at the moment

  • Candid_Technology_66@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    DuckDuckGo. I wanted something privacy-respecting, but Startpage was blocked in my country and SearX had problems with my language. Anyway I’ve heard an advertising company bought Starpage so I wont use it. Also bang shortcuts are great!

    (Also is it just me or DDG doesn’t approve new bangs now?)