• superseven@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    173
    ·
    1 year ago

    After 10 seconds of reading an overlay appears that asks you to subscribe to their newsletter.

    • rifugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those are so infuriating. Especially when it’s for some random website that you’ll likely never have a reason to visit ever again. Does anyone actually subscribe? I highly doubt it, though who knows what old people do (I used to do end-user tech support and I’ve seen some shit). I’ve come across a couple of stores offer a small discount if you subscribe, which is at least a legit reason to do so, but this discount is so small that I even then I don’t bother.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Surprisingly, yes. I have no idea why people put their email addresses in those things, but they do. I put a tiny email capture on one of my websites once as an experiment. I didn’t even offer anything, It just said “Keep in touch”, and thousands of people signed into an double opt-in mailing list in the 3 weeks I had it up. Fucking weirdos.

    • 30p87@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bonus points if you had to enable JS beforehand because they load the content in via scripts afterwards.

      • rar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago
        • 30 mb of JS for 1 kb of text.
        • Can’t zoom or scroll freely without JS interfering.
        • Double-click on a word and it calls another script for ‘assistance’ instead of selecting the word.
        • Right-click is disabled or bring their own ‘menu’ that does nothing.
        • 30p87@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right-click is disabled or bring their own ‘menu’ that does nothing.

          Me trying to copy a link in discord web:

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      And first thing when you open the page your browser prompts you to enable notifications for the site so they can spam ads that way too

      • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I always wondered does anybody (with sane enough understanding of tech) accept notifications? It’s the one thing I hate the most, it triggers anxiety and takes my attention away from what I have to do.

  • SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    AI is even worse. It takes over the biases and misinformation of the info it was trained on, shows these on its answers to users who pick up those biases and use them elsewhere on the net, what is then used to train AI. It’s all becoming a shitification loop.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The future of the internet is the movie the human centipede. But with AI and what comes out is the new internet.

      • mob@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I agree with the sentiment, I’d imagine you can easily make the argument that written language is also for recording and documenting, not purely for human to human connection.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The meme is good, but the timeline is off. It was more like 2003 when websites didn’t suck. (Maybe earlier than that, even.)

  • Spaceballstheusername@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think people remember the amount of crazy websites that were out there spouting absolute nonsense. Websites had very little credibility.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but if you googled a product you could get to user written reviews instead of the manufacturer website claiming its the best shit ever made and ai written „reviews” citing the history of the brand.

      I honestly hate what internet has become

  • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well the difference is they didn’t use to ask you to accept cookies, they just took them.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly that fucking box everywhere is worse. It should be a God damn setting in the browser not per page shit.

      • oldfart@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is a setting in a browser. In the early 2000s the browsers even came with their own built-in popups asking if you want to accept cookies from this domain. Of course this was annoying so everyone had it set to “accept all”, which then became the default and eventually disappeared.

        20 years later, some moron lawyer reinvented the same but worse.

  • LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I went to a site today that had a full page cookie popup. When I clicked manage cookies to disable, it presented me with a a choice of “eagerly interested” and “consent”. WTF is that? I didn’t see the opt out option right away so i just left the page.

  • Polar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean no website back then was telling you to block them if you want. They just didn’t use javascript to detect blockers.

    Also web hosting has gone WAY up. My simple static website used to cost $5 per month to host. Now it’s $30 for the same spec server. The ones that are closer to $5 are so insanely oversold and slow, a website takes a good 30-45 seconds to load.

    • oldfart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless you have millions of hits per month or your “static site” is Wordpress with a page builder, you might want to look into other web hosting offers. A VPS is overkill for a static site, and you can get a decent VPS for $10-$12 range. With enough bandwidth and io to host many static websites.

      • Chobbes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can easily host a static website on a dirt cheap VPS. The Hetzner ARM boxes are less than $5/mo with an IPv4 address and are going to be more than sufficient for the average static website… My website is on a cheap VPS with worse specs than the Hetzner ones and it does not take 30-45 seconds to load.

    • CoderKat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      A true static site can use GitHub Pages for free hosting (probably other options, too – never checked). That’s what I do for my ultra low traffic personal site (at least, I assume ultra low – I don’t install any tracking on principle). I pay for a domain and that’s it (and that’s just to look nicer, not actually necessary).

      • meliaesc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve being using Netlify, it’s really professionally feature rich, and the free tier is more than enough for my needs.

  • Dumbkid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hell most sites back then didn’t even have mobile support yet and still used tons of flash elements, that was just the beginning of mass internet adoption due to smart phones

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man I got so excited when Flash finally came to Android. And then not that long after, Adobe announced that they’d be discontinuing it.

  • mayo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are more useful web apps than before but blog/affiliate sites are a plague.

    That said if I could make a ton of money by clogging up the internet with garbage content then I would. There is nothing holy about this place.

  • satnififu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here’s some ads to cover my costs

    Narrator voice: it doesn’t cover their costs, but they have investor money so it’s ok