Just a question about the text-to-image side of things.
80% of the time when I put in text prompting for a mature adult (SFW/NSFW) image it returns patently underage/child results.
Is there any language I can use to eliminate underage results?
Negative prompts seem to be included with positive, so if I put ‘child, cub, underage, immature’ in the negative prompt it seems to up the ratio to 100% underage content.
So, clearly, my prompt usage is incorrect or the AI engine is doing something opposed to the given prompts - and it did the same with the ‘older’ engine (whatever that was)
Sadly, this was one of the “downgrades” of the new model.
The old model was pretty darned accurate when simply using numeric ages (at least for humans/goblins), the new one is horrible.
My previous age prompt: [if (mlf.checked && cgr.checked) {“{40-58} year old”} else if (mlf.checked) {“{59-69} year old”} else if (cgr.checked) {“{40-58} year old”} else “{20-35} year old”]
Now, it’s a total crapshoot, and it definitely defaults to younger. Adding “mature” and/or “older” seems to make little to no difference.
I dunno what you’re putting in the prompt. Could you perhaps provide example prompts? For example, I put this as the prompt:
Adult girl, brown hair, blue eyes
And what do you know, it generates photos of adult girls with brown hair and blue eyes. No underage content whatsoever. I don’t know why you’re specifically getting underage content unless you’re putting in specific stuff. It may be an issue on your end, because for me, it works just fine.
Using either the furry - cinematic or furry - digital painting
Anthro art style, zoomorphism character, anthropomorphic in the style of furry art, anthropomorphic animal. Pulitzer Prize-winning photojournalism, adult white furred anthro skunk male, full body portrait, tall lean build, athletic build, mature male, pristine white fur without markings, fluffy tail visible in background, tousled white hair, cobalt blue eyes, soft fur texture, well groomed fur, smooth high definition fur, rueful expression, relaxed pose, soft lighting, celestial aesthetic, bedroom background, high detail, furry, solo character, Wearing sleeveless jacket of pockets and loose cargo pants torn off at the calf, no shoes
I get 20 ‘underage’ results like this
For every 1 ‘mature’ result like this
You should probably asked within the furry community because the style isn’t universal. But furry digital painting doesn’t aim for underage results
Your same prompt, not that bad but indeed there’s younger looking results.I think you have to modify the style and custome it, especially furry cinematic. It’s because it aims to realistic and skunks are… Small irl
Just say he’s 50 year old
Oh, I see. I mainly generate human images nowadays since I don’t like the direction of how the furry art went. Try putting “adult” in the prompt and remove any mentions of numerical age (e.g 20s).
I always put such things in the positive promt: Adult, mature, full grown Ect, ect, ect.
It churns out a 5-10 year old 80% of the time.
negatives don’t work like that, although negatives don’t work correctly if using none formatted for flux.1 SPN’s general negative generation – general oppositional, procedural logics & settings generator control dash super prompt negative or a super prompt body negative module, that or the currently excepted complementarily counterpart too SPNs which are OSAs orAn OSA’s negative‐space Generative controller or controllers block that and 3rd party factored P∅RT OSA negative basis module.
