The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent term ended with a flurry of conservative-leaning decisions that have been met with shock and disapproval, particularly from the left. This conservative trend is seen as a reflection of the 6-3 conservative majority established during Trump’s presidency. Noteworthy rulings include siding with a web designer who refused services to same-sex couples, ending affirmative action in colleges, and dismissing President Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan.

    • MasterOBee Master/King@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It takes a lot of logical leaps to go from ‘someone paid for his vacation’ to say 'they’re just ruling with whatever rich person is sending them money! I can’t point to any specific people…or cases they ruled on, BUT THEY ARE!!"

        • MasterOBee Master/King@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can’t explain anything because you can’t prove what you need to about your statement. You made a statement, but you failed to prove any part of it. I’ve read every single word you’ve wrote and gone to each of your sources.

          Show me how money has altered any of the sitting current justices opinions.

          • S_Roman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve read every single word you’ve wrote and gone to each of your sources.

            Reading something doesn’t mean anything if you don’t understand it.

            Show me how money has altered any of the sitting current justices opinions.

            See above and actually read in good faith.

            • MasterOBee Master/King@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Reading something doesn’t mean anything if you don’t understand it.

              Hahaha, come back with an actual argument, instead of some loose ‘see he went on a paid vacation, therefore he just gets paid to rule court cases for rich people.’

              You made the claim, I asked which case you thought that they ruled on based on corruption, and what their flawed legal reasoning was.

              You can’t back anything up that you’ve said. If you want to be convincing, you gotta back up your claims.