Support is waning for corporate involvement and advocacy around many of the country’s biggest hot-button social issues, according to a new Public Affairs Council survey shared first with Axios.

Why it matters: No business wants to become a political football ahead of the 2024 election.

  • zeppo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I owned a couple of small businesses and never saw the point of taking sides on political issues. Personally, of course, but not the business or myself when representing the business., which includes my personal facebook account which had 2,500 people from an industry I was in. Prospective or current customers weren’t looking to the companies for political advice… they wanted us to do our jobs for them. From a practical level it seemed like taking a stand on divisive issues would lose us more customers than we’d gain.

    • toasteecup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s a different situation when the company is a big company.

      Example, I like knowing my grocery store is trying to use sustainable food procurement practices.

      I don’t really care about my grocery store having an opinion on gun rights other than to say “don’t fucking use it in the store”

      • theotherone@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do want to know where a company stands on social issues. If they don’t want/don’t care about the people I care about t h en they don’t need my money either.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s the thing though, it’s almost never relevant. I don’t care what Budweiser thinks about the LGBTQ community. It makes no difference if Target supports abortion rights or not. These things are entirely divorced from the business these companies are trying to carry out and yet they take up a sizable chunk of public discourse and advertising space.

        Politics taking over every aspect of culture is insufferable and this seems like a great place to start when it comes to making politics less combative. Let’s stop making a taco purchase a political statement.

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So the heart of what you are getting to is that the techniques of marketing have become so effective, efficient, and advanced that it’s mechanisms have realized the best way to get people to buy things is to appeal to deeply held opinions and beliefs and that practice is bringing those beliefs and their contrasting opinions to the forefront of common discourse. Which is then in turn both unveiling the deep ideological divisions that already existed amongst us to light but is also inherently exacerbating those divisions by raising their profiles. All in the pursuit of further revenue. The issue isn’t politics invading everything, it’s everything invading politics

          Marketing is just propaganda with a business goal rather than a political goal. We should’ve put stringent limits on what it’s allowed to do after we watched what Goebbels and Riefenstahl were able to do

          • Maeve@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            We should’ve put strict limits on it with Bernays’ “torches of freedom” rubbish.

        • Oshka@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would feel the exact same way, but there is one thing stopping me. These companies then use my money (and others) to fund super pac’s to lobby congress and buy politicians to enact legislative I think is morally and socially bankrupt. When companies can no longer do this, I think that’s the day business becomes less political.

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am indifferent to the politics of Bud Light (can’t/wouldn’t drink it anyway), and I understand they wanted to modernize the brand and broaden it’s appeal, but it’s almost comical how badly they misread their audience. Of course the people who reacted badly are a bunch of wankers, but… those are the people who drink Bud Light.

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but it could harm a business my size. I wasn’t interested in discriminating among customers based on their political views. But if I even responded to memes about politics on Facebook i could end up with colleagues or store owners not wanting to work with me. Stuff specifically relevant to the business, sure, of course take a position on that.

    • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not a businessperson but you’re not supposed to publicly support stuff, that’s what the secret money funds are for…. Donor privacy!

  • Maeve@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Instead of virtue signaling, let them put out quarterly public reports about what they donate to what causes and politicians. I’m holding my breath, of course.