• Throwaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Its a lot easier when you have slave labor and don’t care about the enviroment or human lives

    • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It unquestionably is but it sounds like you’re implying that high speed rail is some sort of utopian megaproject and not a solved problem of basic, reliable and effective infrastructure that is a great bang for your buck in every country that builds it.

      • bestnerd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean we actually own land in the US where it’s not owned by a person in the same sense in China. So it’s easier for the government to cease it and do whatever it wants with it

    • iminahurry@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I understand what this comment is trying to say, but I doubt US is very big on caring about environment. Remind me, how many fracking projects?

    • jormaig@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spain has the lowest cost per kilometer in the world when it comes to building High Speed train (14.5 million €/km) and they care for the environment and don’t have slave labour. Rather, they have very strong unions.

    • oo1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Like in Spain with much smaller economy and almost 4 thousand km - admittedly they started back in the 1990s I think.