I particularly like his look in the final frame

  • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Jim Davis specifically made a character to sell shit. He did some interesting development with his comic for the first decade-ish, then unabashedly launched a media empire. Good for him, frankly-- not everything has to be high art and hawking shit to the masses is a valid way to live your life.

    Throw in the fact the he appreciates (and has never tried to sue) derivative works like Garfield Minus Garfield or I’m Sorry Jon makes him ok in my book.

    • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know it was the plan to begin with. I’m just highlighting the difference to how Calvin and Hobbes is regarded today as opposed to Garfield. One is seen as art, the other as a brand.