Alt text: three panels with “fossil fuel vehicles” (full of traffic),“electric vehicles” (full of traffic), “walking biking & public transit” (peaceful city with people riding bikes and trams)

  • Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay, but you still need lorries and cars for goods and countryside dwellers, who need access to the city as well

    • kimpilled
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those things are still available, they’re just not the only option to the detriment of everyone else. Most people and things should be entering the city by rail, which removes the need for city destroying highways that are ever widening.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      well the first part is just plain false and the second is marginal: you can deliver things in cities by e-bike and very small electric trucks, and people on the countryside are first off like 20% of the population in almost every country but can also be served by public transport in 90% of cases.