danhab99@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 months agoemacsprogramming.devimagemessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1594arrow-down174
arrow-up1520arrow-down1imageemacsprogramming.devdanhab99@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 9 months agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squareTOR-anon1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24arrow-down7·9 months agoI use nano. Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
minus-squaremosiacmango@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·edit-29 months ago4 letters < 2 letters. vi forever.
minus-squareTOR-anon1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down4·9 months agoSimplicity > Complexity
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·9 months agoThat’s when you switch to a IDE.
minus-squarePrunebutt@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·9 months agoNeovim and emacs are IDEs.
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-29 months agoYes, if you can remember the shortcuts… M-x IDE
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·9 months agoNano is the best when you just need an editor, you can as well use an IDE instead of vi(m) or Emacs.
minus-squareElDieLaDer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·9 months agoOk but why use nano when micro literally exists
I use nano.
Nano >> vi/vim, emacs
4 letters < 2 letters.
vi forever.
Simplicity > Complexity
Not if you need any work done.
That’s when you switch to a IDE.
Neovim and emacs are IDEs.
Yes, if you can remember the shortcuts…
M-x IDE
Nano is the best when you just need an editor, you can as well use an IDE instead of vi(m) or Emacs.
Ok but why use nano when micro literally exists