• Vent@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Leaving out the TV makes it less precise and more clickbaity because then it sounds like Android phones are affected.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess the problem is that “Android TV” is a specific thing that none of these devices actually are, they’re just dodgy boxes running Android that can be plugged into a TV.

      For me it’s more clickbaity because Android TV isn’t actually involved here at all.

      • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d say it would be more clickbaity if you just removed the “TV”, because it’d make you think of smartphones, and those would be much more concerning

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah I’m not sure what the correct headline is, but at least for me I definitely clicked because I thought it was to do with Android TV, which it wasn’t. It was about those cheap boxes that anyone reading Ars already knows are probably filled with malware

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why not just find a different website reporting the story with a better headline? Rather than sharing the one with the headline you fear is misleading?

      • Vent@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s only slightly misleading and Arstechnica writes really good articles. It’s pretty much the only news site I regularly browse.