• underline960@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The first half of the book is great.

    The second half has ads that take up more and more of the page until you reach a page that is just ads and a QR code.

    When you scan the code, it takes you to a website asking you to pay a subscription for the remaining pages.

    (If you rate five stars, they send a 10% discount code to your email and add you to a newsletter list without an unsubscribe button.)

    • veebee@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      FWIW Cory narrates this book. And he has a YouTube video embedded that has the first hour if you want to hear how it sounds.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I agree with you about Wesley (🤮), but that’s not really relevant to this book?

      Cory recorded the audio himself to my understanding (listened to his appearance on the QAA podcast), and it sounds like his voice reading it on the linked podcast.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Wow, my brain really failed me here! I ALSO listened to Picks and Shovels recently, which was narrated by Will Wheaton, and somehow the voices got switched in my memory. You are correct, Cory recorded this himself.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      His ideas are fantastic. Execution and characterization are spotty. Been a while since I read anything of his, but IIRC, he has a tendency to dip into surrealism or absurdity that feels cringey instead of his artistic target.

      In some ways, it’s similar to a lot of Golden Era SF. You read it for the ideas, not the story.

      I do have a favorable opinion of him and his work. I’d really enjoy Doctorow being paired with a traditional fiction author and both being rode herd by a hardass SF editor.

      • brisk@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I assume this is specific to his fiction?

        Very much my experience with Walkaway. Unauthorized bread (short story) was a little better executed imo.

        • Machinist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Correct, specific to his fiction. I don’t know if I’ve read a non-fiction book of his. However, I’ve never read a bad article or essay by him. He has great insight.

    • Localhorst86@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      personally i read “Down and Out in the magic Kingdom” as well as the german translation “Backup”, which - while not masterpieces - were quite enjoyable.

    • brisk@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      For non-fiction I’ve read Chokepoint Capitalism and The Internet Con. The Internet Con was a lot like his online essays, to the point where it felt redundant, but he does good essays so if you haven’t read them it’s a good way to get around his work. Chokepoint Capitalism was a little more novel (probably in part because he coauthoured). Neither were very dry, which is significant for the genre.

      Fiction, I’ve read Walkaway and Unauthorised Bread. Walkaway is good worldbuilding with both fascinating and bizarre ideas, but I don’t think it’s good fiction. Unauthorised Bread is a short story available online and is excellent.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I highly recommend the recent episode of the QAA podcast with Doctrow, it’s an amazing listen!

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    An older book I frequently refer to:

    On Bullshit | Princeton University Press https://share.google/DaiZS6wG7SiOCdRcg

    “One of the most prominent features of our world is that there is so much bullshit. Yet we have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, how it’s distinct from lying, what functions it serves, and what it means.”

  • Steamymoomilk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is Frickin sick.

    I must get a copy, i love this authors writing. I also very much enjoy he respects the right of ownership and anti-drm

    • sol@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why do you think everyone is using the term is wrong? Plenty of words get overused until they become meaningless but I have mainly seen enshittification used to refer to large companies significantly degrading their product in a bid to increase profits which is what I understand it to mean. If it’s used a lot, it’s because it’s happening a lot (often by companies who built their products in the zero interest rate, infinite money era and now have to face the new reality).

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I see it used as “things got worse” a lot but I did a quick search and looks like you’re right, on lemmy it’s used correctly most of the times.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not necessarily… Death of the author and all that. Once it’s in the public, it’s out of his hands