Hey everyone. I made a casual survey to see if people can tell the difference between human-made and AI generated art. Any responses would be appreciated, I’m curious to see how accurately people can tell the difference (especially those familiar with AI image generation)

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    Got 9/20.

    That was a good selection of images, quite tricky.

    I’m proud of getting both the LEGO minifig ones correct.

    • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Another 9/20er here. I did feel like I was guessing a lot, it was almost satisfying to get such a midway score.

      • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I also got 9/20, feeling certain about only a handful, and completely thrown off by others. Since all questions were yes/no, expected score would be 10/20, so my score correctly reflects that I had no real idea what was AI-generated or not. I expect the average score to be close to 10/20, skewed somewhat higher by those who might have a keen eye for some telltale signs of AI-trickery.

  • Noved@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    The one that got me was definitely the fruits, I didn’t realize that AI was able to generate decent text yet lol

    • popcar2@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      DALL-E 3 is the only model that gets text right. It usually yields consistent results but can still jumble on words if you ask it to say too much. It’s a big step forward regardless.

      AI generated photo of a cat saying "I'm king of the world!"

  • Cwiiis@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    10/20 but I’m a little annoyed that what looks exactly like a panel from Berserk is apparently AI generated… Feels like the training data might just be replicated in entirety there, either that or someone asked it to generate “Guts from Berserk” 😛

  • muhyb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    I got real life ones correct, almost all paintings too (10 was tricky) but charcoal drawings are kinda impossible to guess.

  • TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    10/20, got tricked by the horse in one of them, it looked really messed up, like something AI would make.

    I guess the artist cant make horses

  • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Cool test, thanks for putting this together! I got 8/20 - this essentially proved to me that for many cases, AI generation is not really distinguishable anymore.

  • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    12/20, these new systems are way too good at what they do. With drawings it’s basically impossible to tell unless there are obvious mistakes. And the mugshots are spot on too.

  • gullible@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Detail plays a huge role in determining AI, and many of the pictures appear compressed which makes that criterion… difficult to consider. I’m not surprised that I got half right, regardless. The man on the bench really got me, why is his ankle thread-thin?

  • Traegs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    I got 12/20 and most of the ones I got wrong are the ones I was second guessing myself on.

  • ArtyTester@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I got all the “real life” pictures correct, but most of the drawings and paintings were in line with straight guessing.

    There are things that stick out as “wrong” on a picture of life, but in a drawing or paining the question is “is this wrong or just what the artist decided to do?”