• Mothra@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve seen some videos completely AI generated that looked flawless yesterday. Every day I feel more and more uncertain I’ll ever find a job again in the industry.

    • ChiwaWithMujicanoHat@mujico.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s funny how in most old scifi they showed a future where we as a society had AI working labor intensive jobs but art was a human-only activity. I guess we didn’t account for how bad capitalism was going to overpower our value.

      • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I think artists like Andy Warhol and Jackson Pollock have done a lot to preserve the humanity of art. For Andy, he would never need an AI to generate a soup can. Even if he did it’s Andys commentary and perspective that is coveted. The same is true of the most intricate paintings or sculptures and their creators. Jackson showed us the act of making art is just as interesting as the art itself. An AI could pop out a million abstract pieces that looked exactly like a Pollock but… it will never be a Pollock. AI is no more a threat to art and the people who make art than the camera was.

      • XEAL@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        As of now, here is no humanoid AI robot replacing manual labor, just trained AI software/tools/APIs that run on computers and perform some specific and somewhat complex tasks.

    • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You mean the generated anime scene stuff? Those DO use sketch frames made by a real artist who then uses AI to combine t he em into animation!

      AI may be a crapshoot but it loves being given physical guidance. Don’t tell it to draw a person, sketch a person and then tell the AI to turn that into a person.

      Basic photoshop skills do work wonders. The better you are at art, the happier the AI will be to co-operate.

      (Source: I do earn a small amount helping fix AI generated art and frequently get asked to doodle up base material)

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        No, I don’t think I’ve seen that one unless it’s the corridor crew one, which to be fair still had a ton of work- but, no traditional animation though.

        I mean photorealistic stuff. And while it’s still not exactly at the same level of quality a studio can produce, the rate at which it’s progressing is jawdropping. It’s already rough getting an artistic job at a studio; in five years from now I’d be surprised if those jobs aren’t at least halved thanks to AI. Because as you said, AI cooperates really well.

        • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s not really unique, is it. Tech has always been working to increase output for a given unit of work or money. Animators used to sketch and record every frame. Then famous animators made key frames and outsourced 80% to sweatshops. Now you can animate scenes by layer and by object on your computer. I do have concerns about nefarious use (regarding both material and employment replacement) but this isn’t a distinct AI issue, it’s a normal greed issue with a new scapegoat

  • DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Weirdly enough this is a terrible example. I kinda like it (but for all the wrong reasons)

  • stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I could make the same meme but swap AI and real artist and as an example of the “real artist art” use my drawings (and I’m like really bad at drawing). It would make as much sense as this meme. But I can’t really tell if it’s some AI art hater meme or just a meme. I sometimes see people meaning memes similar to this deadly serious, so sorry if I’m being a nitpick.

  • XEAL@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The fact that one AI generated image looks incoherent or shitty doesn’t mean that all AI generated images are.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      A lot of them are like that and that’s actually a good thing.

      It’ll be a little while before people can generate photographs that are indistinguishable from the real thing, completely destroying our ability to critically evaluate anything.

      So we still have time to stop it.

      • XEAL@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        People can already, one has even won a contest.

        You can use offline image generation tools like Stable Diffusion if you have a powerful enough machine. Also, if someone generates an incoherent image and keeps it, it’s mostly for the sake of it, because you can try generating the image over and over again until something good comes out while tweaking the prompt and the negative prompt.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Man, my faith in humanity meter keeps dropping and dropping and dropping with every little thing I see on Lemmy today. Can we get some good news, please?