• salacious_coaster
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    6 months ago

    For reference, the “Hopeless Dipshit Percentage” in any population is about 25-33%.

    About a quarter to a third of the population believes in witches, ghosts and ESP; that the earth revolves around the sun; that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11; that Obama was born in Kenya; and that evolution and climate change are hoaxes. A third of the US population can’t name a single right guaranteed by the constitution or even one branch of government. And a quarter of the population self-professes that they wouldn’t stop supporting Trump no matter what he did.

    In that context, only 3% willing to pay any money for AI is an utter failure. The LLM bubble needs to burst yesterday, and the whole Internet needs to roll back to 2022.

      • salacious_coaster
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah but that particular lunacy is grandfathered in to society, so I avoid it in my rants

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t know how true this still holds but two years after 9/11 70% of the US thought Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11. My guess is that number continues to be higher than 30%.

        • Dragon-sided D@mstdn.science
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          @salacious_coaster I believe that the root cause of the critically important problem that you are highlighting, is the widespread idea that “faith” – that is, belief without evidence – is a virtue.

          It is not.

    • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m really hoping it’s a slipup that you included the Earth revolving around the sun in the list of crazy, there’s quite good evidence for heliocentrism!

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, “ideally” (to AI companies) those 3% would be the people who use it the most, so businesses and employees who get real value out of the stuff. Depending on who are considered AI users, it’s not awful as a B2B thing. Selling to the general public is definitely a no-go though.

      • V0ldek@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        so businesses and employees who get real value out of the stuff.

        I have really bad news about what percentage that would be

      • Steve@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        “businesses and employees”

        the business pays for it, the employees “use” it.

        the business measures the value by how many employees they can remove.

        if the business is measuring “productivity”, how are they doing that? Is it jira tickets? Is it timesheets? are they measuring quality? Is it starting to seem like you’re trying to pick up water with your fingers?

        if you pretend that ai ceos are actually doing marketing the trajectory is right there staring you in the face

  • kamenlady@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    6 months ago

    they look forward to turning chatbots into a sea of spam:

    We expect rapid adoption of advertising models, transaction fees, affiliate revenue, and marketplace models.

    We’re doomed.

    In the last weeks Pinterest became unusable imo. The AI “sea of spam” is no joke. 7 in 10 posts are ads now. AI ads. Every one of them is a grotesque AI mimic of the content you’re viewing, all words meaningless gibberish. The things on the thumbnails suggest, but you can’t make things really out by just seeing the thumbnails.

    So i clicked them a few times too much. First by curiosity, then by mistake, because Pinterest does everything to make an ad look like a post.

    7 in 10 posts.

    After all these years successfully procrastinating with Pinterest, it has become a dopamine blocking experience.

    • @kamenlady @dgerard i knew the guys who started Pinterest. My account is literally like one of the first 10 public accounts. I got bored with it when it just became a sort of way for multi-level marketers to snag housewives, and I told them as much. But I’m surprised they allow AI slop on it. Genuine creativity and inspiration is why they really started it. Tote was pretty slick for that. It’s sad what it’s turned into.

        • @Squizzy We Heart It, was founded by a former Pinterest engineer, but I don’t know if it’s still around. Many early Pinterest engineers went off and started similar projects after after the “the boys” made it more ad infested because they got greedy and Ben used to do marketing at google. So…they’re not nice people anymore. But I know a few early employees started similar things.

  • blakestacey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 months ago

    The management regrets to inform the TechTakes/awful.systems community that this post has apparently escaped containment. In order to continue providing the environment that this community deserves, we will be distributing free tickets to the egress in response to comments that exhaust our patience.

    • V0ldek@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Mods when a post escapes containment: No! No!!

      Sickos like me when a posts escapes containment and they get to see the worst takes humanity has to offer: Yes… Ha ha ha… YES!

  • peteyestee@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    They are going to make it sub service to kill off the poor people from living with society.

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    This shit is not Artifical Intellegence. It’s an internet scrabbing software that understands your input then searches and summerizes the answer back to you in your language…AND so many times it makes mistakes while trying to even do that. 0 intellegence, 0 creativety, 0 feelings/empathy/sympathy , 0 everythign. In programming, it’s like a computer-science intern on methamphadmines. he’s searching stackoverflow and githubs repos for any question you have, but again he will never come up with a new geniuos unseen before scripts of programming and he may make mistakes.

    Also, it brainrotted the skill of learning itself to kids and killed our interactions and creativity

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    let me guess 3% are the corporate heads, c-suites, mba, and the people either implementing it or deploying it.

  • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mostly have this gemini assitant because google esentially added it for me. Of course i tried a bit of gpt. My advice is that, if they’re good there’s a chance that they many not be anymore in the future. Or not how you expect them to be. We have to make it good too, but right now the world is hooked with AI.

    I have seen to much ai spam to care for ai images, there is this youtube series with ai assisted animations (monoverse, neural viz), that is the only good use of ai i ever seen so far in media creation. But, other than that, it’s getting distopian out there.

  • brap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ve used it here and there for recipe inspiration based on what’s in my cupboard, but really don’t see any other use for it my life. I would drop it in an instant if it became chargeable because it’s pretty shit at most things otherwise.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    That is known & not a problem for the megacorps.

    They are building an environment where using AI will be a must (like smartphones that spy on you have become today).

    At that point it becomes overpriced & will under-deliver (the monopolistic enshitification of an already shitty offer).

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Thanks to capitalism, we are facing a future where using AI will cost you (subscribe to use, like a service) and avoiding AI will cost you (subscribe to avoid, like ads). Both sides of the equation will be monetized and we will all pay the price.

    • Rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      God I’m so gonna become Amish, I’m gonna become the most Amish motherfucker this world has ever done gone seen

  • Lucky_777@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Soon you’ll get one or two prompts a day, then be pay walled.

    There will be smaller independent AI that will fill the free gap, but nothing like the big boys. You’ll also be judged in job interviews for what AI you do use. Hell, it’s already a question asked.

    Gotta roll with the changes or be left behind sadly.

  • pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    I would pay for AI for personal use. But TBH the free models are more than enough for my needs already, so there’s no reason to pay for something more advanced. Also, often these “more advanced” models are slower. I’d take speed over some wall of text that takes a while.

    We’re in the SliceLine era of AI. Enjoy it while it lasts.