cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/5592397

Forty years ago, Richard Stallman announced the plan to develop the GNU operating system, which would be entirely composed of free software. The existence of a free operating system would enable people to operate their computers in freedom, throwing off the power of the developers of nonfree software. The GNU Project has also built the global free software movement.

  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Forty years ago, Richard Stallman announced the plan to develop the GNU operating system

    40 years ago and their “OS” still misses the most important part of an OS being an OS. I love how they pretend that the GNU tools are somehow an OS.

    Edit: To quote the great Linus Torvalds:

    In short: just say NO TO DRUGS, and maybe you won’t end up like the Hurd people.

    • Spectacle8011@lemmy.comfysnug.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forty years ago, Richard Stallman announced the plan to develop the GNU operating system

      This is completely true. The GNU Project’s plan was to build an operating system in 1983, and they intended to call it GNU. The fact that they didn’t build every tool for the operating system doesn’t change their goal or the work they put into it. We have GNU Guix now, an operating system “entirely composed of free software”, so mission accomplished?

    • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I would dispute that the kernel is “the most important part of an OS.” It certainly is an important part - but it does nothing by itself, and a user cannot do anything with it.

      Anyway, the reason Hurd isn’t a priority anymore is because we have Linux (well, more specifically, Linux-libre). There’s no need to reinvent something that is already available in the free software world.