Elon lied about the monkeys — and he shouldn’t be trusted to put his Neuralink chips in human brains.

“They are claiming they are going to put a safe device on the market, and that’s why you should invest,” Ryan Merkley at the Physicians Committee, told Wired. “And we see his lie as a way to whitewash what happened in these exploratory studies.”

Really heartbreaking reading what happened to the monkeys.

People quite rightly think of Elizabeth Holmes as a fraud for making false medical claims about what the Theranos machines could do. So why aren’t Elon’s claims at Neuralink being held to the same level of scrutiny?

https://futurism.com/neoscope/terrible-things-monkeys-neuralink-implants

@technology #Elon #Neuralink #ElonMusk

    • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or desperate. Forget the investors, Elon lied to those who saw it as a last ditch effort to beat their diseases.

      • Holyginz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah damn I didn’t think of that. I feel for them, but elon is the last person they should trust for that. I don’t honestly know who they should trust these days. But techbros aren’t one of them.

        • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          As a general rule of thumb, you should trust that a tech bro will con you by taking a normal idea and throwing around a bunch techno jargon to make it seem like cutting edge technology.

    • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup. You have to be a special kind of trusting to allow a company to modify your brain.

      Banal attempts at mind control, crude as they are, are bad enough already.

      • Holyginz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Honestly, interface chips in our brains would be a logical step at some point in the future. But hell would need to freeze, then thaw, then freeze over again before I trust anything of elons being inserted in my brain.

      • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s easy to say as someone with a healthy brain. A blind, deaf or a paralyzed person might feel different once there truly is a way to get your sight back with this technology.

        • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t have a healthy brain? Could be better could be worse but no fucking way would I let a private company with a shady safety record run by an insane megalomaniac fuck with it.

          Anything that’s plugging into your brain just can’t be controlled by a small group of people with the sole motive of line goes up. Open research and public ownership are required. The consequences are just too terrible otherwise.

      • _number8_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        i don’t particularly wish torture on anyone but if any of his techbro dipshit followers want to sign up…

    • Jlafs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they need the brains of their patients to have fewer wrinkles and have been playing 5D chess this whole time to ensure that happens