One of the world’s most common artificial sweeteners is set to be declared a possible carcinogen.

(Edit- Question from OP: downvoters, do you not want me to post stories like this, or are you expressing disagreement with some of the people in the report?)

  • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It does not take into account how much of a product a person can safely consume.

    So I’m getting the sense this is about as meaningful as “Known to the state of California to possibly cause cancer”.

    I’m really not a fan of this extreme level of caution when it comes to public health warnings. There comes a point when people will simply stop listening to you entirely if you constantly tell them that everything they do has some 0.00001% chance of harming them. Then, when you try to warn people about genuinely concerning risks, people will simply ignore you.

    • stevecrox@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Its the way its reported.

      A few years back there seemed to be a plethora of studies which were “Consuning <insert hot liquid> increases chance of throat cancer”.

      You would have to go to the source report (if lucky the bottom of the article) to find out it increased the risk by 0.1% - 0.5%.

      When you factor in only 2,300 people in the UK (70 million) get throat cancer each year and the biggest risk factor was smoking and non smokers are pretty much within statistical error bars.

      It makes the report uninteresting and only useful in a “someone already looked into this” way and yet a month would go buy and there would be a new article … who knew chicken soup causes cancer…

    • livus@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I discovered that California cancer thing recently when I bought a keyring tool. Crazy.