• Sordid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    At least letting them talk in the name of free speech lets you know who the Nazis/fascists/white supremacists are

    That’s great and all, but knowing who the Nazis are is just step one. Without taking additional steps, that knowledge is useless.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That knowledge literally ended the employment of a lot of white supremacists that were filmed in Charlottesville overtly chanting against Jewish people. You see? They were given enough rope, and they hanged themselves, and now those images and reputation can keep others informed about who they are and never to give them an inch.

      Free speech is the absence of consequences by the state, but once you know someone is a proud white supremacist, you don’t have to keep them employed, or renew their lease, or hire them, or stay married to them, or invite them to your wedding, etc. A known Nazi can suffer social consequences all day and be socially ostracized, if they were emboldened enough to disclose that fact instead of spending their lives infecting people with shit like "I hate urban people in the inner cities." Shit like that can appeal to the weak minded.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’d obviously be better if the Nazi ideology never surfaced in the first place, but that would require a good level of education, empathy, and social support…or as the right puts it, “leftist woke indoctrination.”

        Instead you have disingenous discourse defended under the banner of free speech. Fascists have historically used this right as their anchor point to undermine Democratic institutions.

        Usually they amplify their racist/hate speech, xenophobic messaging, and nationalistic fervor during times that Democratic institutions are under particularly extreme pressure by natural disasters or domestic/foreign wars. Democratic societies tend to propagate comfortable and idealistic upper/middle class citizens when they’re doing well (not under said pressures), often fostering the sentiment for a live and let live philosophy, even for those with dangerous hateful ideologies and rhetoric.

        Then, when the Democratic institution is inevitably put under stress by external or internal circumstances, Fascism accelerates and gains momentum in the public consciousness not because they debated better or have genuinely good ideas on how to solve the society’s problems, but because they argue that is the only way everyone can survive, when in fact they are usually just narcissistic megalomaniacs who want to control everything and everyone around them, ultimately destroying personal freedoms and diverse communities in the name of moralist, nationalist hegemony.