• Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yes it does.

    There is literally nothing of substance behind the claims that “this one is different” it’s the exact same argument from the exact same unreliable sources. Literally the ONLY difference is that this vaccine was made controversal by American politics.

    If you are against the covid vaccine then you are an anti-vaxxer, whether you realize it or not.

    • DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s not strictly true.

      This was the first FDA-approved mRNA vaccine, so it is “different”.

      Source

      Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is the first mRNA product to achieve full FDA approval in the U.S.

      • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        You’re technically correct so I don’t understand the downvotes, you most obviously didn’t imply anything else. Love the mrna technology, went out of my way to get vaccinated during pregnancy (because Germany was a bit slow with that), literally worked on Covid, Anti-Covid meds and mRNA in the lab, and you’ll have my upvote. You’re the best kind of correct after all. Don’t get discouraged.

      • SCB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Most people here do not have fully functioning brains and cannot distinguish someone being correct from someone blathering nonsense.

        Upvotes and downvotes are purely based on whether or not your vibes match their expectations.