Amendments. They’re looking for the opportunity to give amendments.

This is all Democratic leadership is capable of coming up with. They want to be able to ask “pretty please” to the Republican majority before their suggestions get voted down and they vote for this piece of crap CR anyway. This is all they’re asking for. Nothing to stop Trump and Musk from running roughshod. Nothing to rein DOGE in. Nothing to reverse the damage DOGE already did. Just the opportunity to give some suggestions that they know will be ignored by the GOP in the end.

Democrat leadership is spineless.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The filibuster is right there. You kept it around for a reason.

    Turns out, that reason was just that democrats needed an excuse when they broke campaign promises.

    • jonne
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The filibuster conveniently doesn’t apply to budget reconciliation and appointments, the only 2 things the Republicans actually care about. They should’ve always pushed to get rid of it, because the Republican agenda has always been both economic, and stacking the courts in order to enable the executive to ignore Congress.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh, are republicans using reconciliation? Because it’s my understanding that reconciliation involves a joint session, which isn’t happening right now.

        • jonne
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          If needed they’ll probably do that, yeah.

            • jonne
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              How? It’s in the house now. The senate isn’t doing anything. Typically the house comes up with a bill, the senate comes up with a slightly different bill, then in reconciliation they work out a compromise and vote on that.

                • jonne
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  There’s probably stuff they could do, but not the filibuster. I mean, they could use the filibuster on every other thing in the senate, and they definitely should do that. I’m definitely not interested in making excuses for them.

                  They definitely do have leverage that they’re not using.

  • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I really want an answer on this, why is all the media blaming Democrats for the shut down? Republicans have a majority and can pass it without them, how is that the Dems fault?

  • halfempty@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Dem leadership just wants plausible deniability that they didn’t “cause the government shutdown”. This way, it is the Republicans who denied the path out of a government shutdown, and thus it’s their fault.

    • jonne
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Nobody will care about whose fault it is because Republican voters get their news from partisan media. If they’re told it’s the Democrats’ fault, they’ll believe it. A simpler message has a better chance of breaking through: “Republicans have a majority everywhere and still shut down the government because they can’t govern.”

      If you get involved at all with their games, you’re just starting a back and forth about specific amendments that will just make things so murky even people that follow the news won’t even understand by the end.

      If you are going to go with amendments, just have simple demands that are universally popular (stuff like: fire Musk, stop the tariffs, …).

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Schumer has never fought for a single thing in his entire life. Check out his wikipedia page.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    afraid of the same megadonors that also fund the gop. not very hard to vote against the gop everytime, since the gop wouldve done it in reverse anyways. and thier voters arnt going to suddenly wake up and say “wait a minute, the gop isnt doing anything”