Controversial AI art piece from 2022 lacks human authorship required for registration.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    If someone is doing work for you, you get the copyright. That’s how it always worked

    • xkforce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      This isnt always the case. Tattoos for example, are commissioned and paid for but the actual copyright often resides with the artist not the person that paid for the work.

      • ripcord@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, the artist must agree that copyright transfer is part of the agreement. By default ownership is with the artist.

    • stevexley@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      That’s only with the artist’s agreement though isn’t it? Usually because you’re paying them. In this case the artist isn’t a person so can’t grant you the copyright (I think)

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Yes, in practice this would be a contract with the artist deciding whether the copyright is transferred or not.

        Because by default, if you commission someone to draw something for you, they keep the copyright.