fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 21 days agomutual 🍞 aidlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down15
arrow-up1227arrow-down1imagemutual 🍞 aidlemmy.dbzer0.comfossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 21 days agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squarefossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-220 days agoDo you have proof of this based on your definition? Anarchists do not support any state by definition.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·17 days agothe best i could come up with if i’m playing devil’s advocate is that i’ve seen like 3-odd posts here that made me go “that’s a bit weird”
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·20 days agoYes but these are not anarchists. Their sidebar, the content they promote, and their moderation history make it all very clear.
minus-squarefossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·20 days agoI would like to see proof of this, if possible. I’m asking because I would like to know.
Do you have proof of this based on your definition?
Anarchists do not support any state by definition.
the best i could come up with if i’m playing devil’s advocate is that i’ve seen like 3-odd posts here that made me go “that’s a bit weird”
Yes but these are not anarchists. Their sidebar, the content they promote, and their moderation history make it all very clear.
I would like to see proof of this, if possible. I’m asking because I would like to know.