• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    knowing full well you didn’t answer the question I laid.

    They never answer the question you asked them, instead they just yell at you, telling you how bad you are for asking the question.

        • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That would be because the question is as ridiculous as asking a blind person why they don’t just open their eyes so they can see.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That would be because the question is as ridiculous as asking a blind person why they don’t just open their eyes so they can see.

            Just because you may judge it is ridiculous doesn’t mean it actually is ridiculous.

            If you’re having an intellectually honest conversation with someone, and they ask you a question to make their point, you really are supposed to answer it and not avoid answering it.

            By avoiding answering the question you basically signal that you can’t answer the question for whatever reason, not that it’s not worth answering, and that your side of the argument is weak.

            • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can’t have an intellectually honest conversation if there is a bad actor. Intellectual conversations of any kind are predicated on at least two parties doing the mental work necessary to understand the other side, rather than arguing simply for a feeling of being right.

              The moment a question like that is posed, it’s no longer an intellectual conversation, it’s one person put in the position of teaching something basic to someone who doesn’t want to learn. No adult owes that to anyone, unless they are being paid to do it.

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The moment a question like that is posed, it’s no longer an intellectual conversation, it’s one person put in the position of teaching something basic to someone who doesn’t want to learn.

                That’s one hell of an assumption / straw man you have there.

                I would challenge you to consider that you might be incorrect about that, to consider not doing that classification if it’s just questions you don’t like, or more importantly, don’t have an answer to.

                • AnalogyAddict@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  It’s not a good look to assume that someone doesn’t have an answer, just because they don’t find it worthwhile to teach you basic thinking skills.

                  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Still doesn’t negate my point.

                    You can throw insults around like a fighter jet shooting out chaff to avoid a missile strike, but that doesn’t change anything.