Has any of that happened on the average Arch in the past years? The only thing I have seen is an email once or twice a year asking to run a manual operation to fix a package migration.
All the time and I’d also add issues caused by bugs introduced with updates. Using Gnome you have your addons break with every new version and don’t get me started on Plasma 6. What a horrendous piece of crap. I still low key hate Plasma 6 even today.
I like both Arch and Manjaro, I like the ability to pick the right tool for the job. I can tweak and better understand my system with Arch, I can be trouble-free and productive with Manjaro.
So Arch is a terrible distro
Has any of that happened on the average Arch in the past years? The only thing I have seen is an email once or twice a year asking to run a manual operation to fix a package migration.
Grub entry missing and Nvidia driver installation not going smoothly did happen to me, though the former is somewhat independent of the distro.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grub-hook
Yes.
All the time and I’d also add issues caused by bugs introduced with updates. Using Gnome you have your addons break with every new version and don’t get me started on Plasma 6. What a horrendous piece of crap. I still low key hate Plasma 6 even today.
I just say glibc
always has been
Ironically enough ive had less nvidia drivers breaking on arch than on any other distro
It might be trash, but it’s our trash.
But seriously, sometimes it does get a bit annoying. Hunting for optional dependencies and missing libraries and whatnot…
YES.
I like both Arch and Manjaro, I like the ability to pick the right tool for the job. I can tweak and better understand my system with Arch, I can be trouble-free and productive with Manjaro.
I mean, I’m a relative gnu / linux noob, but so far Endeavour has been awesome.