• fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What you want in that situation is called a “replicated database”, not a “distributed ledger” and certainly not a “blockchain”.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      99.999% of the time what people imagine when they say blockchain is good is effectively just the matrix protocol, which can be summarized as federated eventually consistent databases (and that’s pretty dang neato).

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        If a single organization owns all the servers, there’s not even in theory a reason to prefer blockchain over a plain replicated database. And in practice anyone who’s pushing blockchain is either an ideologue or a scammer; either way they don’t have the user’s best interests at heart.