• Vent@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s the classic “If I owe you $5 it’s my problem. If I owe you $5B it’s your problem.”

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    if a worker is on their phone during a shift for 5 minutes it’s time theft and unfair to the corporation because that’s 60c of productivity lost. if a corporation systematically extracts maximum profit from a worker while paying them as little as possible, that’s fine cause they took a risk or something

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unfortunately for the most part, capitalism is. The companies that do exploit their workers and their customers make more money, Corporations that make more money than their competition then get in positions to do shady shit to kill their competitors. In the end of course there’s plenty of shitty jobs that treat their employees like garbage to jump between, and very few jobs that actually treat their workers like humans.

  • Poggervania@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    Banks in 2008: “Hey customers, be ready for some real shit with the housing market - we can’t help you guys out.”

    Also banks in 2008: “hi government, can we pls have all the money so we don’t pay for our fuckups?”

    • senoro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except the banks payed it back. The US government profited about $15bn from the bailouts. Potentially a loss if considering inflation. Also banks were forced to take the bailouts to prevent a bank run. You would almost certainly have taken your money out of CITI bank if they were the only ones receiving a bailout from the government. Which would have cost the government more in the long term.

      Large banks like JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs had already paid back the government bailout by July 2009.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        1 year ago

        So the banks paid it back by charging you more fees, and less interest on your savings

      • explodicle@local106.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        We are considering inflation. Then add on risk adjustment, and we can see it for the corporate charity it is. If it was a good investment, then we wouldn’t have been forced to make it. Yes there was enough private capital to cover these loans.

        Them being “forced” to take loans is irrelevant because they’re the ones buying policy, not us. One interest rate for them, another higher interest rate for them to charge you.

        We are being robbed blind.

      • 0Empty0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are we just going to ignore all the jobs that were lost when the economy crashed? Not just in the U.S. either.

        All because there was an inordinate amount of really bad housing loans that banks KNEW were bad, and just continued to give the loans out.

        If you’d like to learn more about this, Inside Job is a great documentary about this.

      • Touching_Grass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m so paranoid that I was scrolling and saw bank post, then another and another and immediately I was thinking there’s some bullshit in the news I missed which some group was trying to steer conversation towards. Like how wallstreetsilver kept trying to manufacture a bank run. But no, it was Zoe 😆

        I need to chill out.

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Banks Suck. Toronto Dominion Bank screwed me over a few ways… one was a line of credit with low interest rate, until I used it and they jacked rate up from 3% to 11%. Another I had a payment coming out that night, so I deposited money directly in the morning online. The recirds showed cash in, then latter.cash out with + balance. Next day they swapped the entry order and charged an NSF fee for when withdrawl came out first and left negative balance. I went right there and complained, they did not seem surprised and refunded me. But i closed every account, credit card, insurance, and RRSP I had with them. Now with a credit Union and it has been awesome.

  • clearedtoland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s the power of influence. Come to think of it, wasn’t there a book making yourself indispensable? Lynchpin, I think.

    • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whenever I make myself indispensable, I’m dispensed with anyway and then the project just fails.

  • sixapples@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also banning accounts for ‘hate speech’ and then assigning personal reps to Epstein for child rape payment processing