• FredericChopin_@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that these things came out after banning plastic straws shows nobody knows what the fuck they’re doing.

    • aeternum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      straws aren’t even the problem. The largest source of plastic in the ocean is fishing nets and discarded fishing equipment.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The interesting question becomes where these are coming from and why. Which countries?

        Straws may not be the problem, but I remember straws being washed up all over the beach.

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure what you are saying. Straws, like plastic carriers were a well-established product that could be beneficially regulated tp reduce plastic waste. Single-use vapes were a new product category that pretty much came out of nowhere and are now likely to be regulated. Do you want a general purpose ban on every single-use item containing plastic? Not a bad idea, but it would be a big, quite radical change to the way people lived their lives - no biros etc.

      • FredericChopin_@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Straws a literal drop on the ocean compared to what corporations are doing to the oceans.

        I am happy to have paper straws if it helps the planet, but they chose the smallest thing they could do and as always put the onus on the consumers and not the producers.

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          they chose the smallest thing they could do

          They initially chose a thing that would have marginal impact on consumers’ behaviour, yes. Starting in October 2023, people will no longer be able to buy plastic cutlery, plates, bowls, trays, balloon sticks, and other items.

          Which items would you nominate for an immediate ban in addition?

          Regarding consumers v producers - they literally just stopped producers selling this stuff. What do you mean?

          • FredericChopin_@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would shift the onus on the people buying the shit (consumers) to the people making it (producers).

            Maybe we could look at fishing nets, plastic bottles etc.

            To be clear I am all for doing more for the planet but I take issue with the blame being misplaced on consumers when the producers are polluting orders of magnitude more than we are.

            • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              How much less talking about the consumers responsible is appropriate? Or do you think people shouldn’t talk about it at all?

            • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Stopping a producer selling it in a country is putting the onus on the producer.

              I don’t think the narrative of producer v consumer is particularly helpful. Any regulation that hits the producer will also hit the consumer.

              I’d be all for a ban on plastic bottles, but you need proper glass bottle deposit schemes in place first

              • FredericChopin_@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I think it is helpful.

                Consumers can only buy what’s on the shelves. If we limit production then the former isn’t an issue.

                • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Whether a producer is prohibited from producing or selling has zero affect on the UK consumer. I agree that a ban on production would be good, but in the vast majority of cases these are overseas producers, so that can’t be legislated for.

                  • FredericChopin_@feddit.uk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Then wouldn’t we regulate the imports.

                    No Asda you can’t import from X because they do Y?

                    Not trying to argue here, just want to be more informed.

        • aeternum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          why do you think the producers are producing these things? Because consumer demand. If we stopped purchasing these things, they wouldn’t produce them. They only produce them because that’s where the money is.

          • FredericChopin_@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which is more likely.

            The majority of consumers giving a shit about anything that doesn’t affect them.

            Stopping the production of things we actually don’t want people to buy anymore.

            It’s much easier to regulate a handful of companies than it is to educate several billion people and try and get them to change buying habits.

            That’s like excusing a serial killer because victims are plentiful. You wouldn’t blame the victims and tell them to stay away from serial killers. You would punish the serial killer no?

      • Maco1969@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most of the world didn’t use single use plastics until the last fifty years, we could get rid of it all easily, we simply choose not to.

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, we coudl go back to washing powder in boxes, using fountain pens, go back buying fruit loose from greengrocers, make our own yogurt, visit a creamery with a glass jar to buy cream, and get rid of most ready meals. I think “easily” is rather under-estimating the level of disruption it would cause the average person

          • Suspicious@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Tbh I think you are overestimating the disruption, lots people do already buy washing powder in cardboard boxes(it’s also a better product BC you buy it in bigger volumes and you can measure out the exact right amount for your machine and water hardness), picking your fruit from a loose box in the supermarket and putting into your shopping cart in a paper bag or a bag you bring yourself is also super normal, why would you have to make your own yougert? Why would you need to go to a creamry for cream rather than use the supermarket glass bottle return scheme used for milk? I feel like I should note that there a lot of food-safe resins and waxes that can liquid-proof containers that aren’t actualy prohibitively expensive but a bit more expensive and currently less widely produced than plastics. But considering what we’re doing to the planet that sacrifice is negligable

            Yeah the pre-portioned and plated ready meals you buy from the fridge section would probably stop being thing, but there also food-bar things that serve a very similar product

            Obviously life would change a bit and it wouldn’t be painless but I really think people overestimate it and something absolutely has to change

            • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yes. And for the most part, those are lined with a very thin plastic skin - which is what makes recycling difficult. I didn’t mention milk or juice because glass bottles would be the obvious answer.

    • FatLegTed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or even cares. As usual cheap Chinese tat (other third world tat markets are available) and its lapped up here without a thought.

    • Mane25@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      This whole government makes a whole lot more sense once you come to the realisation that they’re all mentally challenged in the literal sense. It wouldn’t surprise me if they couldn’t even conceptualise how the two things are related.