Gentlemen, it is with great displeasure that I must inform you that we’re doing it wrong.

    • Thisfox@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      American toilets are just weird. Why do they need to evacuate into an overful lake like that? Always seems so wasteful, putting 50 litres of water into each flush too.

      • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The oval shape is so a penis doesn’t touch the seat/bowl when you sit.
        On round toilets, someone with a penis might need to touch the seat with their hands the whole time they are seated.

        • Thisfox@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They’re oval here too, but don’t require all that extra water, a lake in every flush. I think you mistead overfull? And I had never seen a real plunger in Australia, we don’t ever need them. Our toilets just work.

      • clutchmattic@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh. New toilets sold in places like California, Arizona (ie dry places) use such very little water that sometimes I need to flush twice to ensure the toilet doesn’t stink

      • heckypecky@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        American toilets use a different mechanism, a siphon sucks the water out while in Europe we just dump water into it and hope it flushes. Water usage is the same as far as I know.

        • Axiochus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Huh? European toilets also a siphon, that’s what maintains a barrier to the sewage line. Source: my siphon broke, it was not nice.

        • Thisfox@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Water usage per flush here in Australia is significantly lower. And yet the system is cleaner and more reliable. I had never even seen a plunger until my first US visit; We don’t need them here because our toilets work, unlike the huge American toilets which clog and require too much water.

          • Followupquestion@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Australia, IIRC, standardized on larger drain pipe sizes, so of course your toilets don’t clog. For some reason only some commercial buildings use the larger standard here. As for water usage, my toilet uses 1.3 gallons per flush, and they sell more expensive toilets that use much less but have a stronger pressure system. If/when this toilet breaks I’ll be getting one of those most likely.

    • sfgifz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s an American tradition, the setup in other countries don’t have that problem