Sure Todd, lol

  • Otome-chan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    151
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    “1000+ planets are dull on purpose”

    No, they’re dull because no human team could make 1000 planets worth of interesting content in a single game development cycle.

        • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You know someone is gonna make a mod that generates random and unique bases from hab complex assets.

          And thats exactly why Bethesda doesnt put the effort in. cause they make the game, then the modders make it good for free… Or it used to be that, now they want to charge for mods and take a cut of the profits for shit they didnt make.

          • Otome-chan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            At a scale of 1k planets you’re going to have to rely on reused assets and procedural generation. At which point people not into procedural generation say that it’s “repetitive”. Especially if you only gen once for everyone and not each run lol.

            AI generation of assets and code will theoretically eventually resolve this, but that’s quite a ways off. They’re not even usable for such with human assistance yet. And if you have ai generating the content, it’s not really a human team making that stuff lol.

    • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They could at least make the random PoI’s interesting if there was some…randomness to them.

      Like, I walk into a PoI, I already know where the chests are, the locked doors, are, where the stupid fucking corpse in the shower is, etc etc. cause I’ve ran through this PoI 20 times.

      I dont know why at least the locations of chests and locked doors cant be randomized. Make things at least marginally interesting, instead of cookie cuttered to extreme.

      • abraxas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I agree, I’ve been saying that about NMS for years. Not that we want to be comparing Starfield to NMS, of course.

      • Otome-chan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can, but randomizing chests+locked doors is kinda complicated, and the more “interesting” your generations the harder it is to code and the more dev time it takes. And for a AAA game release you can’t really do that.

        Key+Lock randomization is something that has been solved, and has been used most notably in procedurally generated zeldalikes. But that’s still niche indie territory, and not used for major game releases.

        • Malta Soron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Couldn’t they just have copied the locations a few times and changed up the doors and chests by hand? Seems like an easy fix.

          • Otome-chan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            yes. I haven’t played the game so idk the details of what’s up. but at 1k+ planet-sized spaces it’s hard to have a team go over that by hand. Planets are large. But I have no doubt that bethesda team was probably super lazy as well.