• circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s true that Netflix isn’t directly responsible.

    It’s also true that Paul should have made more for his labor given the popularity and how that system seems to work.

    Point your anger at capitalism, people. Netflix is small potatoes.

    • Tomboys_are_Cute [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 months ago

      If Netflix isn’t then they should be. If I remember correctly a big part of the SAG strike is about online streaming residuals so it is highly relevant that Netflix has paid him $0. Yes Capitalism is bad but you’re literally on Hexbear, we already know that.

        • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          10 months ago

          General workers should get residuals too, but SAG is actually doing a strike for residuals right now as we are speaking and as communists we should support labor action. Dont do that thing that happened during the video game voice actor strike where people were like “well what about the other people working on the games?”. Thats not the point. Those people should get more compensation too. But support the labor action that is actually happening instead of asking “well what about this other group”. That just serves the bosses interests.

          • IzyaKatzmann [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            The compensation for others follows as a natural consequence of some getting it. It really confuses me as there is no temporal aspect to some of these criticisms.

            Of course others would fight for their own compensation after seeing that others could get it, there’s historical precedent for this. It’s unfortunate that it can’t happen in one fell swoop and that isn’t enough to stop support.

        • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          10 months ago

          “it’s bad for them so it should be bad for him too” seems like a weird argument, and one I often hear against labour improvements. “Why should they be paid well to flip burgers, when I’m not paid well and I do something more important?”

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        My point is that the SAG strike will eventually end with some individuals ending up in a better situation – but the system as a whole will be largely unchanged. That will always be the case when the focus is on the individual over the collective.

        • Egon [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Communism doesn’t come by hitting a big old button. In lieu of a revolution, strikes and winning concessions is actually very good.

    • YearOfTheCommieDesktop [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      So we should vaguely angry at a concept, but never at specific organizations that are a part of the class structure that upholds said concept? Not even when they’re involved in an ongoing labor negotiation+strike?

      .

      porky-happy

      obv the point isnt “wow netflix is a bad apple but capitalism is the best system we have” it’s more “netflix is bad just like every other corporation, they all exploit the working class, solidarity to the striking actors writers, etc”

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The “class structure” you mention is also, in this case, an effect of capitalism.

        But yes, I guess we agree? I don’t really understand the point of calling out Netflix instead of the head of the snake though, if the goal is the same, as you suggest. That’s really my only point.

        There will be an endless number of these situations until we, as a society, focus on the head of the snake. If we focus on all the individual companies first, nothing changes. There will always be more companies. It’s divide and conquer.

        • YearOfTheCommieDesktop [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          on second glance I think we do agree, sorry if that came off too aggro. I don’t think this post is meaningfully overfocusing on netflix though. zooming in on an ongoing labor struggle doesnt inherently distract/detract from larger class conflict IMO

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t think this post is meaningfully overfocusing on netflix though

            Perhaps not! But yeah, I also agree with your point about the labor struggle.

    • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean, for me, the whole “Its AMC that should be giving him residuals not Netflix” isnt the point. The point is that someone should be paying him residuals. And the community note here denies that he deserves residuals for streaming at all.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        I agree with all that. I’m just saying that both parties will point the finger at the other ad infinitum. We should focus on the system that allows them to do that.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      Up until recently Netflix was a massive, massive middleman putting a cash price between people and their ability to enjoy their cultures stories.