Article is from a renowned german IT centric media outlet. Topic is a new ruling that allows for government spying through trojan horses on the press. This ruling is highly alarming.

  • cmeio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thats bad!

    It is still also important to call out who it really is - the governments of all memberstates who are in the Council of the EU - not the “EU” as such. Lets hope the EU Parliament doesn’t get forward with it - with a bit of noise and preassure they are often more willing to do the right thing

  • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The consequences would be devastating. Noone who would reach out to Journalists to uncover corruption, severe economic crime and other cases with government involvement, would be safe to do so.

    This would seriously harm democracy and incentivise relentless abuse of power and crime from and through governmental institutions.

  • DerWilliWonka@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its so fascinating how our EU can switch between fucking good decisions and fucking terrible decisions all the time. I hope this will be avoided by the parliament

    • EE@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Especially when it comes to “security” laws, the EU often seems to be on a concerning track, while it seems to have good ideas for many other areas (consumer protection for example). Does someone have a good explanation for this phenomenon?

      • Aetherion@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Paternalism

        You cannot restrict and reduce restriction at the same time. Instead just restrict everyone, for their own safety.

        In multiple ways, contrary to the US and I think the EU is currently doing the best job of them all.

        • DerWilliWonka@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean you can totally not try to end P2P encryption or allow espionage against journalists by gov agencies. There is nothing power hunger driving them to do so

  • weirdwallace75@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t quite understand. Would journalists be forced to install state-created spyware on their work machines?

    • DerWilliWonka@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No they do not have to install them by themselves but goverment intelligence agencies or police may use them against journalists.

        • DerWilliWonka@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can never have 100% security. And tbf I dont think this is a valuable argument if its about basic freedom of media to not fucking spy on journalists.