• OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Small-scale landlords also usually have full time jobs and use rent to supplement their income. Not every landlord is just rolling in cash.

    • CafecitoHippo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I work at a credit union where we deal with a lot of smaller investors and many of them have properties where they aren’t breaking even on a cash flow basis. But they are using the losses to lower their taxable income while building equity elsewhere. They are (from tenants I’ve heard from) good landlords. Lately we’ve been dealing with a lot of realtors that are buying up properties and that just doesn’t sit well with me so I’m looking to change careers and get more into C&I and CRE rather than SFR investments. Being able to cash out 7.25 weeks of accrued vacation time I haven’t been able to take too is a big plus.

    • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In a lot of places if you own any land you are a millionaire, it’s coming to the point that if you own a condo you are a millionaire.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being a landlord, making money off of the hard work of other people, and still having enough time to have a full time job “on the side” means you don’t need to be a landlord because it obviously isn’t an important job that you have to dedicate time and attention to.

    • TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Choosing to use a basic human right as a form of income is scummy. All landlords are scum, whether they are rich or not.

      • huge_clock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People need a place to stay and not everyone has piles of cash for a down payment. Vote for the change you want, but in this system we need rentals.

        • TheActualDevil@sffa.community
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There should be options for people to rent. Personally, I don’t want to own a house any time soon. That’s a lot more maintenance and repairs I’m responsible for that I don’t want. BUT, the reason it costs so much for people to purchase houses in the first place are because too many people are purchasing multiple properties as an investment, creating an artificial housing shortage. There now aren’t enough houses available for the amount of people who want to buy them, so the price skyrockets. Down payments are typically a percentage of the overall cost. Overall cost goes down, the pile of cash you need to begin is a lot smaller.