• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It can help limit how hot the water gets, and therefore how quickly future storms intensify.

    • Zolidus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, i got that. Wasnt saying that we shouldnt be working towards fixing the issue, was more a comment on the wording of the article like it would have prevent this particular storm lol. Was sarcasm mostly.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s really hard to be sarcastic in a way that doesn’t come across as denial. I tend to avoid it for that reason.

    • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m curious, what could Florida do to reduce ocean temperatures with this money?

      • Kage520@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just saw a video that showed it’s possible the pollution that cargo ships were emitting were actually seeding enough clouds to somewhat limit the sunlight that hit and warmed the ocean. This effect stopped recently when they were ordered to stop emitting so much of that pollution.

        If it’s true they were actually helping accidentally, we could spray ocean water and the salt could actually seed clouds in the same way.

        If it works, it would be like a bandaid on climate change to keep the ocean temps a few degrees cooler for awhile.

        • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s an interesting idea, but not something I would expect Florida to have much say in.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They can limit their own greenhouse gas emissions, by doing things like subsidizing the conversion of homes which currently use fossil fuels for heating, hot water heating, and cooking to not do so, as well as subsidize solar panels on home roofs.

        This won’t lower temperatures from where they are now, but it does reduce the future increase.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also, it let’s people know the issue is serious. If places like Florida that are suffering the effects of climate change already don’t take it seriously, when it’s to their benefit now, why should other places do anything when it doesn’t affect them yet.

          Of course they should, and it will.

        • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In all honesty, it sounds nice and I am not against the idea, but I really have a hard time seeing it having any measurable effect.

          • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Each tiny drop on its own raises the water level an imperceptible amout. Together they fill a lake

        • MisterD@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If they would extract heat from the air or even the water, it would actually help. Not by leaps and bounds but it would at least be carbon negative.