• ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Man’s been dead for 14 years, it’s not like he’s gonna come out with a new collection anytime soon

  • Justin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Absolutely not, I would never! I throw my coat away each time I use one, and buy a whole new set at the beginning of the week. What a peasant!

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 day ago

    Obvs this is my main concern about eventually becoming famous. I wear the same clothes all the time.

    Will my fame save me from this? Some famous people get away with it. I never hear anyone saying “you know, JFK always wore a suit”.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’ll never become famous because I’m doing absolutely nothing to pursue fame. However, if I were to one day become famous, the paparazzi would be bored as hell because I wear the same outfit every day. Except when it’s above 10 degrees, then I swap the jeans out for shorts and ditch the hoodie - but then that’s my outfit for the next 5-6 months.

    • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Which actor made it a point to always wear the same outfit in public to fuck with the paparazzi? In my head I remember Daniel Radcliffe doing that.

    • teije9@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      it’s okay to wear the same clothing multiple times if you’re a man. if you’re a woman you have to throw away everything that you’ve ever even slightly touched

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        There was an Australian news anchor who wore the exact same suit weeks in a row and nobody cared.

        If his female co-anchor did the same, it was immediately in the headlines

      • Ellen_musk_ox@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        But none of their stans are clicking on articles about what they’re wearing unlike Katie here.

        The paparazzi version of Zuck or Jobs is writing an article about some stupid thing they do, even potentially damaging behavior, and convincing the reader it’s evidence of brilliance.

        They wear the same shit because they have no fashion sense. But it’s been spun as “I can’t waste any precious brain power on mundane decisions” which is such a load of BS. What it’s actually demonstrating is they’re both dunces, incapable of picking up basic social skills, unable to engage in basic social behavior, uninterested in exploring something simply for the sake of relating to others.

        There’s all sorts of conclusions to draw.

        But nope, the things you or you do daily well enough by glancing at others, and checking out a store or two is IS JUST TOO MENTALLY TAXING AND WASTING THEIR BRAIN JUICE

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      My main concern is I’m not doing anything interesting enough to make me famous, so to become famous without making any significant changes to my lifestyle would be really strange

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Sounds about as likely as winning the lottery on the every once in a blue moon I’m gifted a lotto ticket. Just not something worth worrying about when there’s far more pressing matters I should worry about and find resolutions to

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    154
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Reminds me of Daniel Radcliffe (I think?) wearing the same jacket or something for months because it made the paparazzi photos useless as people just assume they’re all from the same day if someone is wearing the same clothes

  • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 day ago

    For those wondering, Page Six is basically the shitty gossip part of the New York Post. It’s a rag within a rag – an almost unprecedented level of raggery.

  • EndOfLine@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Global News did an experiment a while back. The men wore the same thing, on-air, for a week. Then the women did the same thing on the following week. Wanna guess what the results of this experiment were?

    Instagram post on it

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’m glad the emails to the station were curious and not complainy, from the couple I saw. Kind of seemed like “yep women are observant and intelligent and naturally asked a question about a rare occurrence out of curiosity“

      Presumably some of the people writing in would structure the world in a less misogynistic fashion, were we to give them magic wands, but they still made observations in today’s world. I would’ve been really sad if all the emails were taking digs at the anchors!

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I didn’t read through them but I saw a few as they passed and I’m pretty sure I saw at least a couple iterations of “did they run out of clothes”, which felt pretty nasty to me

  • NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well, you can do it without question. You’re a pleb. I’m personally appalled that someone of her status would do such a thing though, like some sort of degenerate, homeless jezebel.