Barnes and noble wanted one of these domains and sent an appeal to ICANN. They lost the appeal.

Amazon operates these domains within a category of new domain names deemed “closed generics”, which are domain names that companies have successfully bid on or outright paid to get provisioned and own them for their own use and no one else’s. There has been persistent concern raised that this might create unfair monopolies especially for online shopping.

Amazon is the largest holder of closed generic domains on the internet. Nearly all of their domains they own are not able to be purchased and are for Amazon use only. There has been no consequences for this action and it seems unlikely there ever will for the foreseeable future as well.

  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    This should be damning for ICANN. Amazon, any other corporation, or any other person shouldn’t be allowed such a monopoly, but this is all dictated by money.

    • PupBiru@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      ridiculous that generic TLDs weren’t offered under similar terms as standards written that include patented technologies: that they must be offered under fair and reasonable non-discriminatory terms