• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyzOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The kernel isn’t requiring the driver be GPL.

      Nvidias driver straight up violated the license by talking to parts of the kernel it wasn’t legally allowed to talk to, by shipping its own tiny open source shim to sit between the proprietary and open source parts they wanted to illegally have interoperate.

      This is a case of nvidia straight up actually breaking the law with a literal hack. Prompting linux into implementing new security measures.

      • JATtho@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        The shim module smuggles GPL-only kernel symbols into the non-GPL binary blob. Because the actual module using those symbols is not GPL compatible this violates the GPL license.

        From Linus Torvalds mouth:

        anybody who were to change a xyz_GPL to the non-GPL one in order to use it with a non-GPL module would almost immediately fall under the “willful infringement” thing, and that it would make it MUCH easier to get triple damages and/or injunctions, since they clearly knew about it.

        In short, nvidia is playing with “please sue me” button.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Big company violates copyright law, kernel devteam catches heat.

      What else is new.

    • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Windows has components other companies are not allowed to use too. Why should it be different on Linux.

        • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Windows actually doesn’t allow any driver to work fully. We would still be in the wild west that DOS and Windows 9x drivers were.

          Windows has a massive quantity of components only Microsoft products can use, or can only be used in a certain way. A third-party application loading them might risk their developer keys being revoked without a officially signed license of usage, if the keys are even present. But most situation end up with the software getting blocked by Defender or Smart Screen or the user’s Windows install being considered non-genuine. This is not only for security, but also to protect the license of the many components Windows is using.

          You see no meltdown from Windows users because most don’t care when Microsoft tightens their usage rules. Linux users tend to be more tech savvy due to the need of curiosity to leave the Windows ecosystem, meaning they can care about this because they also tend to be actual part of the community, instead of being strangers or passerbys.

    • SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      We sane ones must stick together. I don’t know why it’s so hard for people to understand that they can’t force Nvidia to go open source at gun point. They just move elsewhere