• wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m actually getting a bit upset at these idealists. They have this childish notion that democracy works in this tit for tat way where politicians “earn” your vote by instating policies that benefit you and that you believe in. Like grow the fuck up already.

    • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yup. They fucked us royally and I’m sort of waiting to see if people organize around this. The DNC needs to go. They’ve known about Trump since 16 and this is the campaign they run? They’re trying to elect him at this point, I don’t know what else to think.

      Democrats: here’s a rock and two nickels

      Republicans: here’s everything you’ve ever wanted and all the libertarian shit you used to jerk off to.

      Liberals after the election: how did we lose??

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Lmao ditto

      Anyone saying that it isn’t the Democrats’ fault is delusional. To win elections, you have to win favor with more people than the opposition, and Democrats failed to do that

      Every argument I’ve been in since Tuesday has basically boiled down to “we didn’t try to get more votes because we shouldn’t have to”

      • Knightfox@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I don’t know, at this point I’m starting to ask myself if it’s the Democrats fault if the majority of the people agree with the opposition? If she had won the popular vote and lost the electoral college I might have believed that it was simply appealing more to the Democratic base or appealing to less enfranchised liberals, but she lost the popular vote by a long shot. Not only did she lose, but she lost after the other guy has had 4 years of public attack, federal crimes, rape convictions, Project 2025, and basically promising that Palestinians and Ukrainians will get fucked. Hell, the percentage of women that voted for Trump went up in this election.

        If people didn’t turn out because Democrats aren’t appealing to leftist ideals enough I fear the message heard by the DNC isn’t to appeal to even more progressive or socialist ideals, but to adopt even more moderate policies. Just facing the facts, but the political left is an unreliable voter group and it’s extremely entitled. Instead of trying to be a foil to Republican ideals Democrats are more likely to try more moderate options. Think of it as creating an alternative instead of being an opposite, Coke and Pepsi instead of Coke and Sprite. It feels like the needle of America’s social equilibrium has permanently moved to be more conservative.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          I think the problem is that Harris was barely appealing to any ideals. If she had run hard on medicare for all and raising the minimum wage, I think she might have gotten the popular vote. Instead, she promised more of the same that we’ve had for the last 4 years.

          • Knightfox@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Eh, I’ll concede that she wasn’t screaming her ideals as loud as possible, but that goes back to my original point. The political left is a fickle voter base. Kamala had good ideas, she had policies, she had been part of the successes made under Biden, but she put most of her focus into attacking Trump. It sounds like the argument being made is that uninformed voters weren’t encouraged enough to vote and more liberal disenfranchised voters didn’t turn out because they didn’t like her policies. If this is the case which makes more sense:

            1.) Making some policy changes so they can get people who don’t historically come out to vote to do so or,

            2.) Making some policy changes so that people who historically come out to vote will vote for them.

            Someone threatening not to vote, when they historically don’t anyways, isn’t much of a threat or motivation.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              You simply can’t predict who will vote and who wont. If Obama went off of previous voter history he wouldnt have ran for president.

  • Davin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think it was both playing chicken against each other. Dem leadership refused to listen to “progressives”, I E.: things that most Americans wanted, and the voters refused to vote until the Dems listened to them.

    So they crashed into each other and now the country is going to burn down.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        They don’t identify that way but most Americans are in favor of progressive policies when asked

        • KidNamedLainah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          The best example is the minimum wage increase in Missouri that recently got put into law. Sinema killed the federal bill a few years ago but somehow deep, red state Americans are not progressive? People love progressive policies, they just don’t like the words associated with it.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Exactly this. Americans don’t care about progress, they don’t even care about human rights. They care about the economy. Clinton was right, “it’s the economy stupid”.

      • weeeeum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        American politicians are not progressive. America has not had a true progressive in decades. Today’s democrat policy has been overwhelmingly stagnant. Status quo plus a tiny tax cut for the working class.

        The millions of Democrats who didn’t vote shows a rapidly growing apathy towards the party and their inaction

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          They had Bernie, but they backstabbed him in two primaries, to please the corporate donors. And maybe there’s the squad, at least two of them are still around.

      • Davin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s kind of a difficult thing to determine, when asked almost no one says they are, but if asked about policies, they tend to go for more progressive policies, even people that identify as conservatives will agree with more progressive policies. The people they vote for however, are definitely not progressive… Mostly, there are a few.

        Then again, progressive in America is pretty much basic human rights and protecting vulnerable people which should be the minimum.

  • eugene171@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The left: Infighting is why Kamala lost!

    Also the left: In this essay I will detail every faction of the left that is guilty of infighting, and why they are wrong…

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yes you should have voted for Kamala and yes it’s the Democrats at fault. Both are true.

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        Absolutely. It’s a two way street here.

        People need to stop turning on each other though. What’s done is done. The left has always been divided but right now we really need to start pulling ourselves together.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      why are y’all scared of taking responsibility for allowing a Nazi to gain power when you decided to not vote?

      the DNC is out of touch with voters.

      that doesn’t absolve the electorate from failing to rally behind a candidate that was the best choice to stop a NAZI REGIME from taking power.

      if you didn’t vote, or voted 3rd party, you’re no better than magats.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        why are y’all scared of taking responsibility for allowing a Nazi to gain power when you decided to not vote

        I voted for Kamala but I still blame the DNC

        the issue is two fold

        a) they played games with democracy, further accelerating the erosion of whatever little faith remains in our democracy institutions. there should have been a primary, not the underhanded switcharoo we got to witness where for the first time in US history since primaries were a thing… we had a presidential candidate nominated without a single vote

        b) while voters are struggling and going through a period of profound insecurity - not only financially but in a very real social sense - they offer more of the same. neoliberal status quo. people are desperate for change and the DNC offers them nothing.

        you blame the voters but you do not want to put an ounce of blame on the party that would rather lose an election than offer meaningful change

        • brianary@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          you blame the voters but you do not want to put an ounce of blame on the party that would rather lose an election than offer meaningful change

          Uh…

          the DNC is out of touch with voters.

          What is this, if not shared blame?

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            i guess the implication is that he puts more blame on the voters, as that is what his comments are mainly focused on.

            me personally I don’t blame the voters at all. just like I don’t blame the German public for voting in the Nazis.

            humans are stupid herd animals who will elect strongmen when they feel weak and scared.

            i believe you can only put blame on people that have autonomy. and the only people with any real autonomy in this country are the elites, which have stuck their fingers in their ears and their heads in the sand for far too long.

            the pressure pot is cooking and I think it’s too late to stop it. maybe if we were a little less greedy over the last few decades and a little less focused on the short term, we could have skipped this resurgence of fascism that we’re about to live through

            but politicians only care about the next election and corporations only care about the next quarter. we are a short term society and have sacrificed the long term health of our country

            • brianary@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Interesting. That’s an angle I’ll have to consider. It seems like democracy with fixed terms and term limits has a similar problem to capitalism: myopia.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          3 days ago

          and installing a Nazi regime that has, on record, stated they will never let go of control is the best answer y’all could come up with?

          how is any of that going to make the struggle BETTER?

          will unbridled fascism help calm the masses and stabilize the inequalities of the previous democracy?

          will it restore and protect the rights of Americans?

          you blame the voters but you do not want to put an ounce of blame on the party that would rather lose an election than offer meaningful change

          I blame the DNC of being inept! I never fucking said they weren’t!

          I can still blame the electorate for allowing a fascist dictatorship to take hold in American government.

          Just because you call out a fault doesn’t absolve the other party, both are at fault here. I’m just disappointed that voters ignored all reason and decided to fuck all of us(including themselves), to spite us.

          btw, what kind of “meaningful change” can we expect now that sweet potato Hitler is in power?

          • weeeeum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Voting for a Nazi won’t make things better, but when people are desperate they want change, any change. Weimar Germany was democratic, Hitler and the Nazi party legitimately won the popular vote.

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            So the democrat deciding to run as the corporatist party again is the voters fault?

            Even running an unpopular campaign that was guaranteed to continue genocide and corporate profiteering, they lost to Trump with all his baggage.

            Maybe people care a lot less who a person is than what problems they say they will fix.

            I’d suggest you move to a blue state if you are really concerned, and I’ll see you in four years for the next election.

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I did what I had to do, which is vote.

        The campaign’s job was to get other people to vote. They failed at their job.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          and voters failed at their job. they failed to recognize trump as a fascist and a direct threat to the continuation of our Republic.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Makes me feel better.

          I guess we’ve got, what, the next 80 years to blame each other until the Nazis kill us all?

          • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            Why doesn’t the DNC have any responsibility in your point of view?

            Blaming the voters is insane. The DNC doesn’t learn from their mistakes and keeps putting up awful candidates that are only there because they will maintain the status quo.

            We want progress, not the same shitty economy and no healthcare and no response to climate change.

            • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              the DNC is to blame as well.

              they gave us their choice. it sucked, but it was better than Trump.

              but that wasn’t good enough for you, was it?

              now look what we’re fucking stuck with.

              • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                No it wasn’t good enough.

                Harris offers essentially the same platform as Trump.

                I know that’s going to upset y’all, but she wants the same things but with a different aesthetic.

                Looking at her immigration policy tells you most of what you need to know about her. Look at her stance on the genocide. Look at her stance on the environment and fracking. It’s all the same as Trump.

                So yeah, you’re goddamn right it’s not good enough.

      • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        It is the political party’s responsibility to put up a candidate worth voting for. We do not owe political parties mindless allegiance. You’ve got it backwards.

        The government is supposed to work for us, not the other way around.

        Harris was always a bad candidate and she had a terrible platform.

        Anti universal healthcare, pro genocide, pro fracking. She literally got into a pissing contest during the debate against Trump where she was insisting that she was more pro Israel and more pro fracking than Trump.

        The DNC has to put up decent candidates. They have to earn our votes. They are not entitled to them.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Should the DNC have put forward a candidate that was fairly selected with grass roots support among the wider voting population?

        No, it’s the voters who are at fault.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          do you think there was enough time?

          use your fucking brain.

          Americans that purposely withheld votes cause this to happen. point. fucking. blank.

          when it actually mattered 20 million Americans abandoned their posts to protect democracy. full stop.

          when a house is on fire, do you save the stuff or the people first?

          Nevermind, you just want to blame the fire dept from not showing up faster.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            do you think there was enough time?

            Yes. Other countries manage just fine.

            Americans that purposely withheld votes cause this to happen. point. fucking. blank.

            Maybe they didn’t purposely withhold votes. Maybe they were just not enthusiastic enough about the DNC candidate.

            20 million Americans abandoned their posts to protect democracy

            This is not democracy. It’s a corporatocracy that’s one candidate away from dictatorship.

            when a house is on fire, do you save the stuff or the people first

            The house is on fire because the two greedy landlords have refused to do basic maintenance and listen to the concerns of their tenants.

            • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              You just don’t get it. You still want to argue about why the house is on fire, instead of trying to save the people in the house.

              That’s the problem with ideological extremists. You just can’t admit that your idea sucks.

              I’ll admit that the Democrats suck.

              Can you admit that your socialist goals were unachievable in the previous political environment?

              Wait a second. 🤔 Was that your goal all along?

              No, if that was the case, you would be no better than the Nazis.

              right?

              • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                Holy shit.

                You could not be more incorrect on more levels if you tried.

                How exactly was Harris trying to put out this fire again? By welcoming the war criminal Dick Cheney into the party with open arms? By arguing with Trump that she’s more pro fracking and pro genocide than he is?

                Harris’s platform offered zero solutions to anything. Her entire thing was “brat vibes” and also I support the corporate powers that be even harder than Trump does. She was literally offering a harder border policy than TRUMP.

                I’m not exactly sure what you think she was saving us from.

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                3 days ago

                If the house wasn’t on fire we wouldn’t need to save the people. Your strategy will never save the people in the house. Neither landlord cares about the people, only the companies providing services.

                • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  again, you’re trying argue about if or how the house is on fire.

                  it was on fire!

                  now it’s burned the-fuck down. People, things, everything has burned.

                  it’s too late.

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        The blame falls on people in power not delivering for the working class/poor. There is no better ally for the GOP than modern spineless Dems who center their politics around them. Every third party voter could have voted for Harris and she still would have lost.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          The blame falls on people in power not delivering for the working class/poor.

          No, I’m pretty sure it was the people who refused to vote. All 20 million of them failed to identify the obvious threat to our democracy and react accordingly.

          There is no better ally for the GOP than modern spineless Dems who center their politics around them.

          Spoken like a true extremist. Now, the sad thing is, I never considered myself a Democrat. I was something of a hybrid between leftist and Democrat. After this election though, I’m neither. Now I’m an anti-extremist, extremist. And I know I’m not the only one.

          Every third party voter could have voted for Harris and she still would have lost.

          We all know that’s a lie. 20 million votes to Harris would have swung it greatly in her favor.

          But that’s fine. You keep lying, and I’ll keep hating extremists.

          • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Cope all you want. But she made the choice to court Republicans and chase the ghosts of Cheney Era Voters and paid for it. When Trump can position himself as to speaking to working class issues than a Dem.

            " hybrid between leftist and Democrat" Yeah a centrists no need to rebrand it.

              • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                3 days ago

                Greatest campaign strategy known to man. Do nothing, shit talk your base, be surprised when you lose. Classic DNC.

                • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  You seem to have confused me for somebody who gives a fuck about the DNC.

                  I couldn’t give a fucking rat ass about the DNC, the RNC, Independents, Green Party, Tea Party.

                  I only care that there are Nazis taking over the United States of America in January. I care that 125 to 200 million Americans will pay the price for the negligence of 20 million Americans.

                  I don’t judge you based off of what your political leaning is.

                  I judge you based on if you are a fascist supporting boot licking Nazi loving piece of shit.

                  If you didn’t vote this election cycle, you’re as good as a fucking Nazi to me. If you voted third party, you’re as good as a fucking Nazi to me. If you voted Republican, you are a fucking Nazi to me.

                  Please, by all means, vote however you want. Vote your conscience. But I’ll still think you’re a Nazi if you didn’t vote for Harris.

                  Not because you are a Nazi, but because you didn’t actually try to stop the Nazis.

        • brianary@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t understand the “we were to small to matter” argument I’ve been seeing. If that’s true, why on Earth would you expect to matter enough to move the Democratic platform, or to shape society after leftists “burn it all down” (whatever that means)?

          • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The argument is based on third party people who voted. They aren’t including the group of likely voters who didnt, mainly because thats not easy to calculate.

            They can see how many registered democrats vs have voted but I’m not sure about the other parties, if people register for them the same way.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I blame both groups. Both groups are known to be stubborn to the point of short sightedness. Lemmy has a lot of blaming of both at the moment and it’s fair

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      This, this was the real problem. Something like 5% of registered Republicans voted for her. Dems usually win the popular vote. There are enough of them to win this, but they choose to alienate them.

    • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ah yes, a perfect example of what OP was talking about. Good work finding it so we can point and laugh at the people that keep looking for someone to blame for their own choices.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Yeah, and your comment is a great example of the Democrats 2024 outreach strategy: a smug, self-righteous attitude that failed to get you any votes.

        • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is voting for your own best interests as a part of a country.

          What kind of fool believes that is supposed to require outreach? Would you rather visit an inept doctor because they make you feel more like a big boy by courting your feelings?

          If voters must have outreach to not show up, that means they see no difference in their own life between the candidates.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I don’t know what to tell you man, you need to get people excited to go vote for you, otherwise they don’t show up. It’s election 101. Harris didn’t do that for her base, so she fucking lost. You can bitch about voters all you want, but it’s not gonna change reality, so maybe that time would be better spent figuring out why they didn’t show up. Again, I’d start with the fact that she ignored her base for the fucking Cheneys.

            • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I understand where you’re coming from but I think there is an atmosphere tinging the conversation (and there are a lot of threads happening so maybe I’m the one doing that, not trying to be perfect here)

              I’m not bitching about voters. I’m saying people are blaming Democrats, or Harris, or whoever they want to, but one side showed up with more people. I see you are continuing that as well by saying she ignored her own base.

              More people showed up for what Trump was selling. Harris was certainly not ignoring her base in favor of the Cheneys but I think you mean they relatively to your expectations (?).

              If she were leaning more right, then I guess that was the correct choice because that’s who showed up to vote.

              • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think she did ignore her base, mainly the working class. It’s not just that she campaigned with Cheney and stuck to hard-right positions on Gaza and the border, but her economic message was entirely about opportunity for the middle-class class. Her working-class message had a few good features, like grocery price controls, but they were small measures shunted to the sidelines. It wasn’t a broad economic message like BBB.

                The campaign was predicated on a series of incorrect assumptions on who would vote for her. Women? They’ll vote for me because of abortion. Muslims? They’ll vote for me because Trump is worse. Working class? They always go Democrat, I don’t need a strong economic message. PoC? C’mon, like they’ll flip for Trump. Wow, we’ve got so many demographics on lockdown, we should try and flip some conservatives! It’s not like my constituents will be so unenthused by my campaign that they won’t bother to come out.

        • hangman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          4 days ago

          Doesn’t make that person wrong. If you need to be properly reached to keep yourself from voting for sweet potato Hitler, I’m sorry but you only have yourself to blame

          • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Did the commenter say they voted for Trump?

            The people who voted for Trump over Kamala are not the leftists on lemmy. I’ve actually only seen one or two people say that they’re going to vote for Trump for some leftist reason. The majority of people said they would vote for her anyway, and a minority of people said they were abstaining.

            You sound really foolish mischaracterizing your opponents. The democratic party failed. Kamala Harris failed. There was no sabotage. She campaigned a conservative platform of military, border control, unwavering support for Israel and said she was going to maintain the status quo. When asked what she would do differently from Biden her gut response was “nothing”. It was a spectacular failure and highlights every single way that the democratic party has entirely lost touch with reality.

            Cost of living has tripled in the last 4 years. Now try telling white working class straight people who weren’t living paycheck to paycheck 4 years ago that you’re going to do everything the same as the guy that came before you. The same guy who broke up the rail workers strikes. No, us trying to explain fascism or project 2025 to them did literally nothing. They don’t understand it and don’t care. They know that their financial situation got worse and that the democratic candidate said they wouldn’t change anything. That’s all they understood. They don’t know what’s fact or what’s fiction, and they think Trump is a brilliant businessman. It doesn’t matter that he’s not if they all think he is.

            The DNC failed. Stop trying to defend them for God’s sake. How are they ever going to actually pose a challenge to far right populism or fascism if you relentlessly defend them from all criticism?

            • hangman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Woah chief, I’m not defending anybody and I didn’t ask who anybody voted for. If you can read then you see what I said is exactly what I meant: if you voted for sweet potato Hitler you only have urself to blame, not the democrats. And if you need someone to “reach you” properly in order to not vote for sweet potato Hitler you only have yourself to blame

              The democrats fucked this up big time, but I’m not going to blame them for the fact that people are too stupid to not vote for the end of our way of life. That’s a personal responsibility that 70 million Americans failed at

              • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                It sounds like you just don’t understand how politics works.

                If you cannot persuade the low information voters, you are failing as a politician. The Democrats, if you believe they wanted to win this, spectacularly failed at the most intrinsic of requirements as a politician: to win over the dullest spoons in the drawer. Society is largely dull spoons. This is the job.

                I have seen nothing in the lead up, nor since their catastrophic loss that indicates that Biden, or Harris actually wanted to win. To the contrary, they look happier than they have been in months.

              • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                4 days ago

                I read that sweet potato line as implying that the commenter themselves had voted for him, my bad.

                I do agree that every human being has a duty to not vote for Hitler. I mean, that was supposed to be the point of the post world War 2 Western education system. Didn’t work out for a lot of reasons.

                But I also believe that many people don’t understand what “voting for Hitler” even means or that Trump poses a threat to them. They don’t understand politics. They don’t understand the way the capitalist economic system functions. They think of it as some ethereal force that gets worse when you control it and gets better when you don’t. They think rich people are brilliant geniuses who have divine knowledge of the economy that allowed them to become so rich. They don’t get it. The political strategy of progressives has to account for that. The democratic party isn’t a party of progressives. It’s a party with a minority of progressives in it, but beyond them, it is the party of the status quo. The status quo has gotten worse, that much people do understand. And they chose the guy who said he was going to change it. He said he’ll fix it and they believed him.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            And if you’re a politician and people don’t vote for you, you have no one but yourself to blame. I wish Harris hadn’t run a dogshit campaign, but she did, and I’m not gonna blame voters because she was bad at her job.

            • hangman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              You’re entitled to your opinion but I’ll readily blame people who vote for a wannabe facist dictator

              People are responsible for their own votes

              • Skates@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                4 days ago

                You can go ahead and blame them, but apparently they heavily outnumber you so I’d get the fuck out of the way if I were you.

                Oh, you mean you’ll blame them on lemmy and never associate yourself with one of them in the real world because you live in a nation split into echo chambers. Cool. Cool cool cool. I’m sure that helps.

              • harmsy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                There’s nothing wrong with blaming them, but we still need to figure out how to get their lazy asses into the booths in 2026, 2028, and beyond.

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s funny how when she losses it’s a dog shit campaign but nobody was saying that before the election.

              • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Just because you’re not aware of something, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. There wetr plenty of people in the media who said the same thing. Hell, you can go through my post history and see how many times I said, “seems like she needs to shift her stance on Gaza,” or, “why the fuck is she campaigning with Liz Cheney?” before the election.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Voters voted a fascist ‘as a punishment’ knowing full well what was going to happen?

    That’s akin to blaming your significant other for your decision to cheat on them.

    Dear voters who pulled this shit: Go get some big pants on and wear some blame. While you’re at it grow the fuck up.

  • ora@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    They’re both right. If you didn’t vote for Harris, you were incredibly misguided. But it’s not my job to get Harris elected, it’s the DNC’s.

    • Randelung@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s everyone’s job to fight a fascist takeover, though. Election subversion is part of the playbook.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        The Republicans didn’t create the democratic campaign. Fighting fascism is everyone’s job but that job would’ve been much easier if the alternative didn’t run on “we’re not as bad a Trump”.

    • 6gybf@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s worse than that - this election was a major win for billionaires, the DNC’s donors that call the shots and decide who gets on the ticket and the same group that backs the GOP’s ticket. The difference in the candidates is a reflection of the range of preferences within the billionaire class. That’s why we can’t get exciting progressive candidates. That’s also why we see so many articles blaming voters or blaming a side - the division keeps people focused elsewhere. Billionaire-owned and managed media (propaganda) keeps them out of the spotlight. Kamala was the far better candidate but she lost because the more hateful of the billionaires put their funds into setting up a false choice (a vote either way is a vote for the billionaires) and then poured on the gas to get the other guy in office.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        the DNC’s donors that call the shots and decide who gets on the ticket are the same group that backs the GOP’s ticket.

        This is how a corporatocracy always wins. Welcome to America.

      • ora@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Between the two inevitable options, Harris was willing to negotiate a ceasefire. I realize there’s theoretically faster options but I was unwilling to make minorities all over the world die on that hill. It’s purely a place of privilege to think there’s no difference between wiping Palestinians off the map, and stopping the war in place.

        • lemmingthelemmers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          No, she wasn’t willing to negotiate a ceasefire. Listen to her. Ironclad with Israel until the end. It’s too late for the democrats now.

          Under their watch almost all of Gaza is destroyed and 100,000’s people dead and displaced. Generations of families and nearly every single hospital, university, school, and mosque destroyed. This is anihilation.

          This is what democrats mean when they say they want a ceasefire. They could have stopped it right at the outset, but they choose to say “Israel has a right to defend itself” and continues to arm Israel as it’s been slowly genociding them for over a year.

          She may have said something about a ceasefire, but just as Biden talked about all of his red lines that Netanyahu blew through, they are just words.

          Maybe now she can become a champion for ending the genocide because Trump will be doing it instead.

          • ora@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Kamala Harris isn’t alone in wanting the ceasefire but she’s in the extreme minority among her peers (i.e. congress). But let’s say you’re right, let’s pretend she has the exact same views on Israel as Trump. In that case the only things on the ballot were the safety of people abroad in Ukraine, the refugees domestically who are at risk of being sent back to hostile territory, Queer people, especially transgender people who are running out of safe countries to be, what about anybody who wants to criticize America without the US Millitary being sent after them. Even though you see all these minorities as worthless, they’ll be coming for you eventually. First they came for the socialists.

            • lemmingthelemmers@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              The thing you don’t understand is whatever they are doing in Palestine they are willing to do to you. What do you think all of the death and destruction Israel has brought there is going to create? Peace and happiness? Kumbaya guitar circles? I wait to see what karma brings.

              Maybe those were the only things on the ballot for you. You know what wasn’t on the ballot for you? The winning issues. Do you know why?

              Because to the democrats it was more important to keep arming Israel than forgiving student loans, a $15 minimum wage, universal healthcare, the dramatic rise in the cost of living/drop in quality of life, cleaning up the East Palestine train fiasco, etc.

              The hardest I have ever seen democrats fight for something was when Trump was in office. They fought him on everything. I thought that energy would carry over if they won in 2020. It didn’t. They let the parliamentarian shut down the party with a penstroke.

              It’s too late. The DNC is dead. They appealed to corporate and centrist issues. They get called the left, but really they are the center right.

              If the democrats really wanted to win and make positive change, they would have chosen Bernie in 2016 and 2020, but they did everything in their power to make sure he lost, prefering to lose to Trump rather than improve the lives of not-rich Americans.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    It may cost a lot of lives, but at least you got your moral high ground. Must be nice having the mental age of a 5yo and be content.

    • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It may cost lives, but at least the Dems stood on… Well nothing. They could of catered to the non voters. Given them something when it was clear that this was happening. Instead they did nothing. They attacked college protestors, they muzzled waltz, they adopted Republican immigration policy, became pro wall, tried to say they were even MORE anti immigration than Republicans. They literally just ran as the 2020 trump in 2024.

      Like. You saw it coming. I saw it coming. They saw it coming. And you want to blame the voter instead of the party that did NOTHING to get it. They were told as clear as physically possible what to do to get that vote. At some point, which we are past, it’s on the party.

      I voted for Harris as a harm reduction vote. And I do wish my fellow leftists could of come out for that. But I can’t blame them at the end of the day. The Dems couldn’t stop being the corporate party for 4 years out of desperation. They thought they could win by becoming the Republican party instead and lost. Bad gameplan. It failed. They lost all 4 seats of government with that plan.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    “I can’t just run on not being the other guy? I actually have to articulate a platform and get people to like me???”