• PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    As much as I love Caesar, I doubt he would have changed the fundamental structural problems with the Republic. He was a lifelong populare, and his belief in land reform was probably genuine, but the Roman Republic needed a total constitutional overhaul. It just was not a well-functioning entity by that time, and I don’t think Caesar ever expressed interest in that kind of radicalism.

    And, I mean, let’s face it, he got stabbed by the conservatives for doing exactly what the ultraconservative Sulla did a generation before (taking dictatorial power without express term limit), only with Caesar forgiving instead of murdering his enemies, and being more poor-friendly - the chance of him getting through something more radical even if that was on his mind was effectively nil.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I don’t doubt for a second that he would have tried to reform and change the system. I just doubt whether he could have succeeded or not.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Reform, quite possibly, but in what way? To what degree? The Republic’s constitution was a mess, and I don’t know that there was any salvaging it without rebuilding it from the ground up - or scrapping it, as Augustus effectively did.