• accideath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s free and open source. That alone is a big plus. And it works fairly well. What does emby do better, that warrants paying $120 for it?

      • accideath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        As I need hardware transcoding, that makes emby immediately non viable for me. I also usually watch via various apps and on tv, which, if you don’t have emby premiere are also not free to use.

        • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 minutes ago

          Stepping aside from this particular thread for a moment. Could you share why you need hardware transcoding?

          Admittedly, I don’t quite understand what components would build a better machine as far as a media server goes, but I turned off hardware transcoding when I first set Jellyfin up on a NUC. The only issues I have are the startup speed of the app, and every now and then it crashes when loading the library and I just relaunch it and it’s fine.

          I’ve assumed it’s the Nvidia Shield doing the heavy lifting as far as playback goes, because I’ve never had a recurring problem with playing any particular file. I’m starting to think I don’t really appreciate the benefits of hardware transcoding.

          • Manzas@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 minutes ago

            Probably bandwidth and client device power limitations. Maybe they are using an old tv with a jellyfin app so it doesn’t support 4k video files / new codecs.