• aleq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 days ago

    Ashamed to ask as an EU citizen, but did UK have some kind of special founding member privileges or something before? Didn’t think we had that in the EU, only the vote by population size stuff.

    • Don_alForno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      A major point the others fail to mention is that they got a special discount on their contributions to the EU Budget.

      This reduction amounts to roughly 66% of the difference between the UK’s contributions to, and receipts from, the EU budget

    • fishpen0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      The most striking in modern discussions is they were allowed to keep their own currency which is why it was so easy for them to leave. They did not have to use the euro and kept the British pound.

      They technically were not required to be part of schengen in the original agreement and were allowed to have their own border policy

      They paid a lower EU membership rebate compared to its wealth or population than other member countries.

      They also had the ability to opt out of rights in the EU charter (which has never actually been exercised)

          • davepleasebehave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            10 days ago

            I think the other countries can effectively kick the can down the road for as long as needed. you do know your onions though.

            • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              That’s what Sweden has been doing yes. However it very much is a “mutual understanding” type situation where Sweden is very attached to the SKE and the EU just doesn’t really want to bother due to the situation being low-stakes high-friction. The UK also fits all criteria for “must use the Euro”, but would not benefit from the same “mutual understanding” that Sweden does because the stakes for the Euro would actually be very large. It is quite unlikely that the EU would just bend the rules and let the UK keep their own currency this time. It is also quite unlikely that the British public would even come close to accepting the Euro.

              Regardless of your position on the matter, remember that Brexit negotiations completely broke down multiple times over much, much simpler and lower-stakes questions. The British Ego is at least as large as the French’s, and if four years of Brexit should have taught us anything it’s that they have extremely unrealistic expectations and actually think that the EU should bend over backwards to have them back.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                What I do consider possible though is a compromise that will introduce national backsides on Euro notes so they can have the King’s mug on it.

    • Mikrochip@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      We do, and Ireland, Denmark and Poland have gotten opt-outs, too (link). The United Kingdom, however, was so extreme about it, that Wikipedia dedicated an entire article just to their opt-outs.

      The UK was no founding member of the EU by choice, if I remember correctly. And later on, they only joined due to the financial prospects, not the underlying idea(ls). They always acted as though they were special when they were part of the union (see aforementioned opt-outs) and completely lost it during the Brexit negotiations, when they acted as though they had some sort of leverage over the entire EU. I quite like CGP Grey’s video on the topic: youtube.com

      In my opinion, the French were right when they didn’t want the British to join the union; most of their initial reservations did come true, after all. So, if the UK rejoined the common market without joining the EU, like Norway, for example, that would be fine by me. But no more.

      As long as the British do not change their overall stance to the EU much more (and come to terms with their non-specialness), anyway.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      The UK joined later.

      And yes they did have special concessions (namely a currency opt-out, like Denmark, and a Schengen opt-out, like Ireland and I believe others), although the UK were far from the only ones that had special concessions. E.g. France has a roughly the same sized economy to the UK yet contributed billions less to the budget.

      I’m not really sure why people act like the UK is the only country who had concessions. Various countries have all kinds of concessions, and the wealthiest ones typically had more, because they had the most political leverage.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Literally not true at all. France and the UK have a practically identical economy size, but France consistently paid billions less.

          You are mistaken if you think countries had leverage to make demands but chose not to use it out of charity.

          • Don_alForno@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I found a list, and while I was indeed wrong, as there are other rebates, France is not on the List.

            I don’t know which numbers you are citing, but if you look at net contributions, payments from the EU to the members may of course also vary.

            The UK was the first country to receive a discount though.

              • Don_alForno@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                It literally does. France does not receive a rebate on the normal calculation by gross national income.

                France did receive more EU payouts than the UK in the past ( Example from 2017 ), leading to lower net payments. That’s not the same as paying less in the first place though.

                • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  You’re confirming that France pays less in.

                  Obviously I’m talking about Net. Gross doesn’t matter. If a man puts 1€ into a box and gets 1€ back, he’s not really paid anything.

                  • Don_alForno@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    You’re confirming that France pays less in.

                    I’m not. They paid more in fact. They just also got more back out.

                    Obviously I’m talking about Net. Gross doesn’t matter.

                    Wrong. What a country pays in and what it gets out are two entirely unrelated questions.

                    Payments to the EU are calculated by GDI and that’s that (except when there is a rebate). They are supposed to be fair based on that metric.

                    Payments back to the members are not “free money” the government can spend on whatever. They are subsidies bound to specific purposes that have their own specific criteria of distribution. They are not designed to be fair by comparison of GDI or similar metrics. If there were, as a hypothetical example, an EU program to subsidize local winemakers, you can see how France would very likely receive more money out of this fund than the UK.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        The big ones are currency and the common agricultural policy. Schengen, meh, Britain is an island. There’s plenty of EU territory that’s not in Schengen what would be important is that Gibraltar joins the area for the simple reason that you can walk there.