• DrPop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      This is specifically about corporations owning private property. Fuck landlords but i’d rather rent from a private citizen than an llc.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That “probably” is just based on complete ignorance. Don’t just throw out nonsense like this, especially when you have no idea.

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Yes, because I called out your ignorance, that clearly means I must have rich overlords. Lol This is some batty ass shit.

      • Betazed@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’m not so sure. The knee-jerk reaction of the cynic in me is to agree with you, but I actually think it’s fairly unlikely that they own rental properties specifically. Many, if not most, probably own multiple properties as rich people are wont to do but, I would imagine that most of those are just “summer homes” or similar rather than something that is rented out as a “landlord” in the way most people think of it. It is possible that they could be investors in these funds, REITs, or other such vehicles which would make them indirect owners of these items.