Nope. Nope. Nope. Nope. Nope.

  • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Maybe this is a cultural difference. In the USA we don’t call any produce “grass”, other than things like lemon grass, which gets called by its full name. No one would say “grass” when referring to spinach. Actual grass, like lawn grass, or plains grass, doesn’t really have much nutritional value to us because our stomachs can’t break it down enough.

    • Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just because we don’t call it grass doesn’t mean things aren’t grass.

      Pretty much all the grains we eat are grass seeds.

    • Chocrates@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh it depends on context. Lawn grass is one thing but wheat is a grass, palm “trees” are a grass. All kinds of things are grasses

    • Roboticide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, it’s maybe cultural to a degree, it’s an Australian article and I’m American, but like, it’s still grass. “Actual” isn’t a scientific or technical term.

      And for all we know, she was picking lemongrass in addition to the greens.

    • Hank@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah it is commonly used to describe plants in the Poaceae family which includes grains, rice, bamboo, sugar cane and lots of others.
      Spinach is not in that family.