The ads are a window into a blatantly illegal underground economy that Meta is not only failing to moderate, but is actively profiting from and injecting into users’ feeds.
  • riodoro1@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1065·
    10 months ago

    The biggest media corporations are allowed to advertise literal crime. Meanwhile saying the word cigarette on tv will get you jail time.

    • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      31·
      10 months ago

      That wock is absolutely fent, and with those prices, that LSD is probably 25i.

      The DMT seems legit tho

  • Remmock@kbin.social
    443·
    10 months ago

    ITT: People who are so quick to suggest ad blockers they miss the point of the conversation.

    • Nightwatch Admin@feddit.nlEnglish
      3·
      10 months ago

      Well, Instagram did just that for my little book publishing company. I signed up for a business account in the hopes of selling some books, putting up some ads, and posting a few updates, only to get a fucking PERMABAN during fucking SIGNUP.

      So you are right and it really is super easy.

          • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
            1·
            10 months ago

            But conceivably they could be enforcing the law by putting pressure on these companies to stop facilitating advertising of illegal services and thereby the flow of business. If they instead just don’t bother with that so that they can use these ads to pick out and track down the juiciest, lowest effort prosecution targets, representing a small proportion of the total market, that’s pure corruption with little to no social benefit.

            To be clear I don’t actually know if this is what is going on, but if it was it would be reprehensible.

    • Echo71Niner@lemm.eeEnglish
      1319·
      10 months ago

      it’s astonishing

      people still not blocking ads, use adblock!

        • Mr_Vortex@lemmy.sdf.orgEnglish
          13·
          10 months ago

          I use an alternative side-loaded Instagram app called Instander which blocks ads and comes with other nice features. I don’t use the platform much anyhow, but when I do it makes the experience actually tolerable.

        • grue@lemmy.worldEnglish
          81·
          10 months ago

          No, what people should start doing is demanding that governments actually enforce the law against Facebook for acting as an accomplice to the myriad crimes the article discusses. Facebook should be dissolved and executives should go to prison.

        • Echo71Niner@lemm.eeEnglish
          24·
          10 months ago

          People use the app, have their info exploited and than complain this is the only way to use a service that is exploiting your clicks, and yet, you don’t stop using it, really weird.

          • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.mlEnglish
            4·
            10 months ago

            eh, I’m a photographer/videographer. sadly I more or less need to use it if I want anyone to find me…

  • NAS89@lemmy.worldEnglish
    33·
    10 months ago

    Similarly, my YouTube shorts are filled with gambling videos and “get rich quick scheme” videos. Seems as though “do not recommend channel” blocks the channel but assumes you have some growing interest in the topic.

    I just want to watch woodworking shorts and plumbing videos T_T

    • boringbisexual@lib.lgbtEnglish
      2·
      10 months ago

      I just got an extension that removes shorts. I tried blocking channels, saying I wasn’t interested, pressing the thumbs down button, but it would still show trash like Jordan Peterson and Andrew Tate.

    • 10EXP@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      0·
      10 months ago

      Maybe do Not Interested and then Do not recommend channel?

      Unless doing the former just hides the video immediately and doesn’t let you do the latter, in which case just call me a fool.

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.worldEnglish
    241·
    10 months ago

    Now here’s the exact problem with the so called “personalized” ads, that Google and Facebook serves what the advertisers think you want to see, instead of what you actually want to see.

    This is the fundamental conflict of interest which the obvious conclusion is that online banner/video advertisements doesn’t work, and has never worked, because ultimately, no matter how many times you shove ads in people’s faces via a thoughtless machine, you can’t “trick” people into liking something. What people want is thoughtful, sincere recommendations by real people, which is why we have seen the rise of sassy brand Twitter accounts being so successful for a time: because there is a real person behind it.

    (Of course, it’s really funny if you take blatant advertisment to its logical extreme, and even that seemed more effective.)

    Of course, Google and Facebook will never admit that they’ve been lying to everyone and themselves for more than a decade, because to do so is to admit that their entire business of Web 2.0 was built on an absurd and illogical premise of again, if you show people ads for things they never asked for a thousand times, then you can brainwash them into liking something.

    In other words, Google and Facebook’s entire advertisment business model, if you really think about it, is really no different than pick-up artist logic, and. They. Just. Won’t. Go. Away.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.worldEnglish
      13·
      10 months ago

      Turns out though you can absolutely trick them into believing conspiracy theories with social media ads.

      • theangryseal@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        10 months ago

        Learn the TRUTH about this thing you’re already primed for by your bias!

        click

        Holy crap! He’s a alien! U cud tell frum the eyez! 👁️👁️👀👽

    • DryTomatoes4@lemm.eeEnglish
      3·
      10 months ago

      Pretty much every industry works by tricking people into liking things.

      Like the razors with four+ blades on them, people buy them cause the commercials say “more blades is better”.

      People wouldn’t seek out extra blades if they weren’t tricked into liking it. They are objectively worse than single blade razors.

      • Rev3rze@lemdit.comEnglish
        2·
        10 months ago

        Exactly. If it didn’t pay off these companies wouldn’t keep shoveling money to Facebook and Google to show their ads time and time again. Marketing is expensive. If it didn’t at least break even then nobody would be doing it anymore by now. Obviously it works, otherwise I wouldn’t ever know what the fuck a squarespace or a goddamn raid shadow legends is.

    • Halosheep@lemm.eeEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      The ads that I mind the least and the ones I find the most effective are sponsors for creators that I like. Short sponsor segments really don’t annoy me as much and I have actually tried a couple products that have advertised that way.

      That said, almost all of them sucked in the end but that’s another subject entirely.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      10 months ago

      I may or may not have acquired exactly the acid in those pics.

      I definitely did not.

      Or did I?

      It looks identical actually and I’m willing to bet it came from the same place.

      If I actually had it that is.

  • tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.ukEnglish
    231·
    10 months ago

    You’re clearly a known customer for those products :p The algorithm is never wrong…

  • Astroturfed@lemmy.worldEnglish
    20·
    10 months ago

    Drugs or Chinese scam products. Had a friend tell me he ordered something that never showed up, turned out they sent these super cheap toothbrushes in the mail and then tried to use that tracking info as proof he received what he bought. They just allow anyone who will pay to advertise illegal shit, scams, whatever it’s the wild West.

  • RobotToaster
    English
    225·
    10 months ago

    Aren’t those ads personalised to your browsing history?

    • Bonehead@kbin.social
      17·
      10 months ago

      Tangently…you read one gay rights article and suddenly your ad feed is filled with hot single dads in my area…

    • deadcream@kbin.social
      11·
      10 months ago

      They are personalised by the “bucket” that data collection companies like Google or Facebook placed you into based on profiling. Browsing and search history is only one of the factors that is taken into account when you are profiled, there are myriad more ways to collect data about you.
      And then what ads you see is determined by what advertisers think your “bucket” wants. If you are male in your 20s living in rural USA and advertisers think that males in their 20s living in rural USA are interested in guns, then that’s what you will see - even if you never clicked on gun ad or searched for guns on Google.

    • Iusedtobeanadventurer@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4·
      10 months ago

      Personally whenever I go to Instagram all I get are cat videos and ads about “targeted mushrooms” and kava drinks…

      It all checks out ¯_(ツ)_/¯