Here’s the rules:

1: Post something you have never done that you think many people do. 2: Read the other posts, if you have done that thing, upvote it. If you have not done that thing, downvote it. 3: If you believe the person is lying, call them out on it in a reply. 4: If you are called out, give the full story. 4a: If you see a thread containing the full story, boost the person you think is right and truthful.

Person who has the most upvotes when the thread dies wins.

  • Zozano@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    That’s what OP is saying. The wording could be clearer.

    Essentially, if you can relate to what the comment says, then downvote.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I think you and I share the same mind, but different eyes.

      If someone says “I never shot a hippo”, then right now I will down vote (because I haven’t shot a hippo), so then if it gets upvoted…

      OHhhhhh. It just clicked for me. Yep, you’re right. It makes sense

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Either my reading comprehension has been turned to dust or you didnt read it

      2: Read the other posts, if you have done that thing, upvote it.

      As in: Upvote, I have not done that thing

      Edit: Seems like I can’t read. I think it’s called double negation?

      • Zozano@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The problem is that the “thing” is either:

        • never have I ever done this <thing> or
        • <never have I ever done this thing>