flamingos-cant@feddit.uk to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agoMaths rulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1292arrow-down115
arrow-up1277arrow-down1imageMaths rulefiles.catbox.moeflamingos-cant@feddit.uk to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squarePoik@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·12 hours agoNope, it means “for any” as in no matter which one you choose it will be correct.
minus-squaredriving_crooner@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 hours agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification I usually used it as “for all”, but its looks like “for any” is used too
minus-squarePoik@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 hours agoI sit corrected. It’s used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.
Nope, it means “for any” as in no matter which one you choose it will be correct.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_quantification
I usually used it as “for all”, but its looks like “for any” is used too
I sit corrected. It’s used as an arbitrary singular value within the proof, so for any always felt more appropriate.