• ptsdstillinmymind @lemmy.studio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are following the Apple playbook. Put out a new system every 2 years and eventually will find some arbitrary ways to force users to upgrade.

    • TwilightVulpine@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think that is going to work as well for consoles as it does for phones. People can just keep playing older games. Living in a third-world country I know that too well. And if they try to sabotage the consoles, that might drive people away from console gaming entirely.

    • MJBrune@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The inner generation consoles aren’t marketed to those who already own that generation. So the console cycle is still over every 7 years or so.

    • phillaholic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apple doesn’t force you to upgrade. They have the longest support length in mobile. What they are fantastic at is convincing you that you need to upgrade.

      • ptsdstillinmymind @lemmy.studio
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t they stop giving updates to slightly older devices. Also, I read reports of them slowing down older models as an incentive to upgrade. Late Stage Capitalism

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They of course stop updating old devices. The 5 year old iPhone XR is getting updated to iOS 17 this month, and they are still putting out security updates to the 9 year old iPhone 5S.

          They started limiting the CPU clock on older devices that had poor batteries in situations where it would try to draw more power than the battery could maintain. Identical devices with good batteries were not slowed down. Literally the opposite of planned obsolescence, but they failed to communicate what was happening which very likely lead people to buy new phones instead of getting their batteries replaced. At that time I had an iPhone for personal use and a Galaxy S5 for work. The S5 started doing the exact thing that Apple prevented when my battery started wearing out and random apps would crash the phone. However, unlike Apple where I could pay them $99 to fix it, Samsung and Verizon essentially told me to go pound sand and wouldn’t even sell us an official battery. We resorted to buying some sketchy thing off Amazon that never seemed to be as good. Kinda funny how Apple got all the hate, yet Samsung was the one that let me down.